Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The impact of sensor placement on graph-neural-network-based leakage detection

J. J. H. van Gemert, V. Breschi, D. R. Yntema, K. J. Keesman, M. Lazar

Abstract

Sensor placement for leakage detection in water distribution networks is an important and practical challenge for water utilities. Recent work has shown that graph neural networks can estimate and predict pressures and detect leaks, but their performance strongly depends on the available sensor measurements and configurations. In this paper, we investigate how sensor placement influences the performance of GNN-based leakage detection. We propose a novel PageRank-Centrality-based sensor placement method and demonstrate that it substantially impacts reconstruction, prediction, and leakage detection on the EPANET Net1.

The impact of sensor placement on graph-neural-network-based leakage detection

Abstract

Sensor placement for leakage detection in water distribution networks is an important and practical challenge for water utilities. Recent work has shown that graph neural networks can estimate and predict pressures and detect leaks, but their performance strongly depends on the available sensor measurements and configurations. In this paper, we investigate how sensor placement influences the performance of GNN-based leakage detection. We propose a novel PageRank-Centrality-based sensor placement method and demonstrate that it substantially impacts reconstruction, prediction, and leakage detection on the EPANET Net1.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 25 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 13 sections, 25 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables, 1 algorithm.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of EPANET Net1 WDN consisting of two reservoirs/tanks (black icons), one pump (black circle), and junctions (blue circles) connected through pipes (blue lines).
  • Figure 2: Processing pipeline from WDN topology to Chebnet input.
  • Figure 3: ChebNet architecture for pressure reconstruction and prediction in water distribution networks (WDNs).
  • Figure 4: Training and validation loss on a logarithmic scale for the reconstructor (a) and predictor (b), using PageRank-Centrality-based sensor placement.
  • Figure 5: Residual distributions for the four GNNs on Net1, shown as violin plots over all junctions in (a) and over non-sensed junctions in (b).
  • ...and 3 more figures