Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Search for new particles decaying into top quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration

Abstract

A search for new particles decaying to top quark-antiquark pairs is performed using proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set recorded with the CMS detector between 2016 and 2018 is used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. Final states with 0, 1, and 2 leptons are analyzed, covering all decay modes of the top quark-antiquark pairs. Heavy Z' bosons with relative widths of 1, 10, and 30% are excluded for masses in the ranges 0.4$-$4.8, 0.4$-$6.2, and 0.4$-$7.4 TeV, respectively. A Kaluza$-$Klein gluon in the Randall$-$Sundrum model and a dark-matter mediator are excluded for masses between 0.5$-$5.5 and 1.0$-$4.2 TeV, respectively. These results set the most stringent limits to date for the considered models in the $\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ final state. In addition, in the two-Higgs-doublet models, upper limits are set on the coupling strength modifier for scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons with relative widths of 2.5, 10, and 25% in the mass range of 0.5$-$1.0 TeV.

Search for new particles decaying into top quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

Abstract

A search for new particles decaying to top quark-antiquark pairs is performed using proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data set recorded with the CMS detector between 2016 and 2018 is used, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb. Final states with 0, 1, and 2 leptons are analyzed, covering all decay modes of the top quark-antiquark pairs. Heavy Z' bosons with relative widths of 1, 10, and 30% are excluded for masses in the ranges 0.44.8, 0.46.2, and 0.47.4 TeV, respectively. A KaluzaKlein gluon in the RandallSundrum model and a dark-matter mediator are excluded for masses between 0.55.5 and 1.04.2 TeV, respectively. These results set the most stringent limits to date for the considered models in the final state. In addition, in the two-Higgs-doublet models, upper limits are set on the coupling strength modifier for scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs bosons with relative widths of 2.5, 10, and 25% in the mass range of 0.51.0 TeV.
Paper Structure (20 sections, 7 equations, 17 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 20 sections, 7 equations, 17 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (17)

  • Figure 1: Example Feynman diagrams at leading order for the production and decay of a spin-1 $\mathup{{{{ \mathup{{{Z}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {\prime}}}$ / $\mathup{{{g}}{} _{ {\text{KK}}} ^{ {}}}$ boson (left) and a scalar $\mathup{{{H}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$ or pseudoscalar $\mathup{{{A}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$ resonance (right).
  • Figure 2: Illustration of the background estimation method. The data set is binned in the leading jet mass $m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ and in the reconstructed $\mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$$\mathup{{ \overline{ {{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$ invariant mass $m_{{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace{}{ \mathup{{ \overline{ {{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}\xspace}$. Disjoint regions are defined according to whether $m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ lies inside or outside the top quark mass window and whether the subleading jet passes or fails the ${ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace\text{ tagging}$ requirement. A method based on control samples in data is used to estimate the QCD background in the signal region E from regions A, B, C, D, and F. The colored dotted points are shown for illustrative purposes only.
  • Figure 3: Prefit data-to-simulation comparison of distributions in the all-hadronic channel for the mass of the leading ${ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace\text{ tagged}$ jet (left) and the reconstructed $\mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$$\mathup{{ \overline{ {{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}}$ mass (right) in the central and forward categories combined, where both jets pass the ${ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace\text{ tagging}$ requirement. The QCD background is taken from simulation for comparison, whereas in the analysis it is estimated from data. No cut on the $m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ variable is applied.
  • Figure 4: Reconstructed $m_{{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace{}{ \mathup{{ \overline{ {{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}\xspace}$ distributions in simulation in the all-hadronic channel for $\mathup{{{{ \mathup{{{Z}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {\prime}}}$ bosons with 1 and 30% relative widths, shown in the left and right panels, respectively. The signals correspond to $\mathup{{{{ \mathup{{{Z}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {\prime}}}$ boson masses of 2, 4, and 6$\,\text{Te\spaceV}$, where both jets pass the ${ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace\text{ tagging}$ requirement. Signals are normalized to a cross section of 1$\text{\,pb}$ and an integrated luminosity of 138$\,\text{fb}^{-1}$. No cut on the $m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ variable is applied.
  • Figure 5: Postfit distributions in $m_{{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace{}{ \mathup{{ \overline{ {{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}\xspace}$ for data and simulation for the central (left) and forward (right) categories for the all-hadronic channel, under the background-only hypothesis. Distributions are shown for the low-$m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ (upper) and high-$m_{{ \mathup{{{t}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}$ (middle) sidebands, as well as the SR (lower). The horizontal bars on the data points indicate the bin width. For illustrative purposes, the $\mathup{{{{ \mathup{{{Z}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {}}} }\xspace}}{} _{ {}} ^{ {\prime}}}$ boson signal with a relative width of 1% and a mass of 2$\,\text{Te\spaceV}$ is normalized to a cross section of 1$\text{\,pb}$ and overlaid to the backgrounds in the signal regions. The lower panels show the pulls, defined as $(\text{Data}-\text{Prediction})/\sigma$, where $\sigma$ denotes the total postfit uncertainty in each bin, relative to the SM prediction.
  • ...and 12 more figures