Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Heterogeneous Long-Micro Scale Cascading Architecture for General Aviation Health Management

Xinhang Chen, Zhihuan Wei, Yang Hu, Zhiguo Zeng, Kang Zeng, Wei Wang

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General aviation fleet expansion demands intelligent health monitoring under computational constraints. Real-world aircraft health diagnosis requires balancing accuracy with computational constraints under extreme class imbalance and environmental uncertainty. Existing end-to-end approaches suffer from the receptive field paradox: global attention introduces excessive operational heterogeneity noise for fine-grained fault classification, while localized constraints sacrifice critical cross-temporal context essential for anomaly detection. METHODS: This paper presents an AI-driven heterogeneous cascading architecture for general aviation health management. The proposed Long-Micro Scale Diagnostician (LMSD) explicitly decouples global anomaly detection (full-sequence attention) from micro-scale fault classification (restricted receptive fields), resolving the receptive field paradox while minimizing training overhead. A knowledge distillation-based interpretability module provides physically traceable explanations for safety-critical validation. RESULTS: Experiments on the public National General Aviation Flight Information Database (NGAFID) dataset (28,935 flights, 36 categories) demonstrate 4--8% improvement in safety-critical metrics (MCWPM) with 4.2 times training acceleration and 46% model compression compared to end-to-end baselines. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-driven heterogeneous architecture offers deployable solutions for aviation equipment health management, with potential for digital twin integration in future work. The proposed framework substantiates deployability in resource-constrained aviation environments while maintaining stringent safety requirements.

A Heterogeneous Long-Micro Scale Cascading Architecture for General Aviation Health Management

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General aviation fleet expansion demands intelligent health monitoring under computational constraints. Real-world aircraft health diagnosis requires balancing accuracy with computational constraints under extreme class imbalance and environmental uncertainty. Existing end-to-end approaches suffer from the receptive field paradox: global attention introduces excessive operational heterogeneity noise for fine-grained fault classification, while localized constraints sacrifice critical cross-temporal context essential for anomaly detection. METHODS: This paper presents an AI-driven heterogeneous cascading architecture for general aviation health management. The proposed Long-Micro Scale Diagnostician (LMSD) explicitly decouples global anomaly detection (full-sequence attention) from micro-scale fault classification (restricted receptive fields), resolving the receptive field paradox while minimizing training overhead. A knowledge distillation-based interpretability module provides physically traceable explanations for safety-critical validation. RESULTS: Experiments on the public National General Aviation Flight Information Database (NGAFID) dataset (28,935 flights, 36 categories) demonstrate 4--8% improvement in safety-critical metrics (MCWPM) with 4.2 times training acceleration and 46% model compression compared to end-to-end baselines. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-driven heterogeneous architecture offers deployable solutions for aviation equipment health management, with potential for digital twin integration in future work. The proposed framework substantiates deployability in resource-constrained aviation environments while maintaining stringent safety requirements.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Data characteristics: (a) raw sensor profiles showing non-stationarity; (b) PCA revealing fault features in minor components (12th--18th); (c) AltMSL/NormAc dynamics across flight phases; (d) cross-phase correlation demonstrating temporal coupling.
  • Figure 2: Workflow comparison between DDF and end-to-end pattern: (a) Conventional end-to-end diagnosis; (b) DDF-based heterogeneous cascading; (c) Two-stage decoupled training data flow.
  • Figure 3: Detailed architectures of LMSD heterogeneous components: (a) ConvTokMHSA with convolutional tokenization and global MHSA; (b) MMK Net with multi-scale micro-convolution and LayerNorm.
  • Figure 4: Temporal keyness visualization. (a) Health Analyzer concentrates on takeoff preparation and landing phases; (b)-(c) Fault Analyzer isolates fault-specific local segments (flattened variations for intake leakage, synchronous thermal fluctuations for baffle damage).
  • Figure 5: Dual-stage keyness analysis: Rocker Cover Leak/Damage vs. healthy reference. Solid: fault sample; Dashed: healthy baseline.
  • ...and 2 more figures