Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Lavrentiev phenomenon in the neo-Hookean model

Marco Barchiesi, Duvan Henao, Carlos Mora-Corral, Rémy Rodiac

Abstract

We exhibit a Lavrentiev gap phenomenon for the neo-Hookean energy in three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity. More precisely, we construct boundary data for which the infimum of the neo-Hookean energy over deformations satisfying a natural regularity and invertibility condition is strictly larger than the infimum over the weak $H^1$-closure of that class. The mechanism underlying the gap is a deformation with a dipole-type singularity.

A Lavrentiev phenomenon in the neo-Hookean model

Abstract

We exhibit a Lavrentiev gap phenomenon for the neo-Hookean energy in three-dimensional nonlinear elasticity. More precisely, we construct boundary data for which the infimum of the neo-Hookean energy over deformations satisfying a natural regularity and invertibility condition is strictly larger than the infimum over the weak -closure of that class. The mechanism underlying the gap is a deformation with a dipole-type singularity.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 7 theorems, 116 equations, 5 figures)

This paper contains 14 sections, 7 theorems, 116 equations, 5 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\Omega=B(\bm0,4)$, and assume that $H$ is convex and satisfies eq:explosiveH and for some $\alpha<\tfrac{1}{3}$, $\beta < \tfrac{3}{2}$, and $c>0$. Then, there exist a subdomain $\widetilde{\Omega} \subset \subset \Omega$ and a bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism $\bm b : \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^3$ such that where $\overline{\mathcal{A}^r}$ is the closure of $\mathcal{A}^r$ with respect to the

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Reference (left) and deformed (right) configurations ($2D$ sections) of the map $\bm v$ by Conti and De Lellis
  • Figure 2: Reference (left) and deformed (right) configurations ($2D$ sections) of the approximating map $\bm u_\varepsilon$
  • Figure 3: In blue the $2D$ section of the region $U_\delta$
  • Figure 4: The transformation $\bm g = s(r,x_3)\bm e_r + z(r,x_3)\bm e_3$ from the (planar representative slice of) region $d$ in the reference configuration (left) onto the intermediate $(s,z)$ configuration (right).
  • Figure 5: The red arrows illustrate the effect of the function $\omega_\varepsilon(z)$, which extrudes horizontally the image by $\bm v$ of the level curve $\{\bm x\in\Omega: s=\mathop{\mathrm{dist}}\nolimits(\bm x, U)=\tfrac{\delta}{2}\}$. This gives rise to the blue curve, which is the image of the same level set by the approximating map $\bm u$. Our construction $\bm b_\delta$ interpolates linearly between that blue curve and the curve $\bm v(\{s=\delta\})$ on the right-end of the transition layer $T_\delta$.

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Theorem 3.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 4.2
  • ...and 5 more