Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Production probability of super-heavy nuclei in fusion

Ning Wang

Abstract

The synthesis of super-heavy nuclei (SHN) through fusion reactions is a critical area of nuclear physics, offering insights into nuclear stability and the limits of the periodic table. However, theoretical predictions of evaporation residue cross sections $ σ_{\rm {ER} }$ remain challenging due to large uncertainties arising from complex reaction mechanisms and sensitive model parameters. In this work, a new and analytical formula is proposed for systematically describing the production probabilities of SHN with atomic number $Z\ge 110$, based on barrier tunneling concept. Together with the empirical barrier distribution method for describing capture, an improved model, EBD3, reproduces 64 measured $ σ_{\rm {ER} }$ within one order of magnitude, with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.351. The model successfully captures key quantities in fission-like process, including fission barrier height, mass asymmetry, depth of capture pocket and the effective fusion barrier height. Predictions for the synthesis of element 119 are presented, identifying promising projectile-target combinations such as $^{45}$Sc + $^{249}$Cf with a maximum cross section of $107.5^{+120}_{-56.7}$ fb. The maximum cross section falls to $3.2^{+3.6}_{-1.7}$ fb for $^{54}$Cr + $^{243}$Am at the optimal incident energy of 244 MeV.

Production probability of super-heavy nuclei in fusion

Abstract

The synthesis of super-heavy nuclei (SHN) through fusion reactions is a critical area of nuclear physics, offering insights into nuclear stability and the limits of the periodic table. However, theoretical predictions of evaporation residue cross sections remain challenging due to large uncertainties arising from complex reaction mechanisms and sensitive model parameters. In this work, a new and analytical formula is proposed for systematically describing the production probabilities of SHN with atomic number , based on barrier tunneling concept. Together with the empirical barrier distribution method for describing capture, an improved model, EBD3, reproduces 64 measured within one order of magnitude, with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.351. The model successfully captures key quantities in fission-like process, including fission barrier height, mass asymmetry, depth of capture pocket and the effective fusion barrier height. Predictions for the synthesis of element 119 are presented, identifying promising projectile-target combinations such as Sc + Cf with a maximum cross section of fb. The maximum cross section falls to fb for Cr + Am at the optimal incident energy of 244 MeV.
Paper Structure (9 equations, 7 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 9 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Contour plot of the macroscopic part $P_{\rm mac}$ of the DNS survival probability. The red circles and the blue ones denote known hot and cold fusion reactions producing SHN with $Z\ge 110$, respectively. The squares denote the three reactions leading to the synthesis of element 119: $^{54}$Cr+$^{243}$Am, $^{50}$Ti+$^{249}$Bk and $^{45}$Sc+$^{249}$Cf.
  • Figure 2: (a) Predicted capture excitation function for $^{48}$Ca + $^{243}$Am with EBD3. The circles denote the production probability $P$ of SHN calculated by Eq.(2) (multiplied by $10^{10}$). (b) Comparison of the total evaporation residual cross sections $\sigma_{\rm {ER} }=\sum \sigma_{xn}$. The squares and circles denote the experimental data of Dubna Ogan15CaAm and the diamonds denote the data of CAFE2 in Lanzhou Gan26.
  • Figure 3: Evaporation residual cross sections for cold fusion reactions $^{64}$Ni + $^{208}$Pb Hoff98Mori04, $^{64}$Ni + $^{209}$Bi Hoff02Mori04, $^{70}$Zn + $^{208}$Pb Hoff02, and $^{70}$Zn + $^{209}$Bi Mori09. The scattered symbols denote the experimental data. The curves denote the predictions of EBD3 and the shadows denote the uncertainties. The arrows denote the positions at $E_{\rm c.m.}=V_B+\Delta$.
  • Figure 4: Total evaporation residual cross sections for hot fusion reactions $^{48}$Ca + $^{232}$Th CaTh, $^{48}$Ca + $^{238}$U CaU, $^{48}$Ca + $^{240,242,244}$Pu CaUCaPu240Ogan15, and $^{48}$Ca + $^{249}$Bk Ogan15. The squares and the curves denote the experimental data and the predictions of EBD3, respectively. The arrows denote the positions at $E_{\rm c.m.}=V_B+B_{\rm f}+\Delta$.
  • Figure 5: The same as Fig. 4, but for $^{48}$Ca + $^{245,248}$Cm CaCmOgan15, $^{48}$Ca + $^{249}$Cf Ogan15, $^{50}$Ti + $^{242,244}$Pu Ogan25Ogan26TiPu, and $^{54}$Cr + $^{238}$U Ogan25.
  • ...and 2 more figures