Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Analytical $polyΛ$CDM dynamics

Pierros Ntelis, Jackson Levi Said

Abstract

We develop a novel analytical dynamical analysis to derive precise energy density ratio evolutions for the $φ$CDM and $polyΛ$CDM models, comparing them to the standard $Λ$CDM model and validating against numerical solutions. Analytical solutions for the quintessence, i.e. $φ$CDM, show sub percent agreement with $Λ$CDM with greater reliability than numerical integration of stiff systems. The $polyΛ$CDM model, a phenomenological modified gravity framework, captures radiation, matter, dark energy, and exotic epochs, offering a streamlined yet comprehensive alternative to existing studies. Its dynamics reveal a global transition from a dark energy-dark matter exchange reflector, through saddle points of matter, radiation, curvature, and modified gravity, to an SVT modified gravity attractor-saddle, and finally to a cosmological constant attractor in the far future, with saddle transitions between modified gravity components. The $polyΛ$CDM model integrates modified gravity models, using dynamical analysis to distinguish observationally viable critical points and differentiate gravity epochs. All three models align with observed cosmic evolution, but $polyΛ$CDM richer phenomenology provides deeper insights into modified gravity dynamics. Code available at GitHub.

Analytical $polyΛ$CDM dynamics

Abstract

We develop a novel analytical dynamical analysis to derive precise energy density ratio evolutions for the CDM and CDM models, comparing them to the standard CDM model and validating against numerical solutions. Analytical solutions for the quintessence, i.e. CDM, show sub percent agreement with CDM with greater reliability than numerical integration of stiff systems. The CDM model, a phenomenological modified gravity framework, captures radiation, matter, dark energy, and exotic epochs, offering a streamlined yet comprehensive alternative to existing studies. Its dynamics reveal a global transition from a dark energy-dark matter exchange reflector, through saddle points of matter, radiation, curvature, and modified gravity, to an SVT modified gravity attractor-saddle, and finally to a cosmological constant attractor in the far future, with saddle transitions between modified gravity components. The CDM model integrates modified gravity models, using dynamical analysis to distinguish observationally viable critical points and differentiate gravity epochs. All three models align with observed cosmic evolution, but CDM richer phenomenology provides deeper insights into modified gravity dynamics. Code available at GitHub.
Paper Structure (49 sections, 51 equations, 10 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 49 sections, 51 equations, 10 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (10)

  • Figure 1: We illustrate the analytical with a constant line and the numerical solutions with dotted line of the model of $\phi$CDM cosmology, in the case which $\texttt{var-zero-is}=3 \times 10^{-17}$. In the third column in the label we describe the intersection point between two function variables, and the corresponding redshift, for example $m(N) \cap r(N) = (-7.3, 0.5)$, $z_{\rm mr} = 1484.5$ means that matter and radiation meet at $N=-7.3$, in an energy density of matter-radiation equality $\Omega_{\rm mr} = 0.5$, at a corresponding redshift of matter-radiation equality $z_{\rm mr} = 1484.5$ [See section ]
  • Figure 2: As Fig. , but we zoom in so that we observe clearly the evolution of the scalar kinetetic term. We illustrate the analytical with a constant line and the numerical solutions with dotted line of the model of $\phi$CDM cosmology, in the case which $\texttt{var-zero-is}=3 \times 10^{-17}$. [See section ]
  • Figure 3: We present the comparison between the analytical and the numerical evolution of the different species of energy density ratios as a function of the lapse function, $\Omega_s(N)$. [See section ]
  • Figure 4: Zoomed in analytical comparison of energy density evolution of $\phi$CDM vs $\Lambda$CDM. [See section ]
  • Figure 5: Energy density ratio of different species, $\Omega_s$ versus lapse time, $N$, of $poly\Lambda$CDM. [See section ]
  • ...and 5 more figures