Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Observational Constraints on Noncoincident $f(Q)$-Gravity with Matter-Gravity Coupling

Andronikos Paliathanasis

Abstract

We investigate $f\left( Q\right) $-gravity with a matter-gravity coupling as a geometric dark energy candidate for the description of the late-time cosmic acceleration within a spatially flat Friedmann--Lemaître-Robertson-Walker geometry. We select a noncoincident connection that naturally follows from the general framework of cosmological models with nonzero spatial curvature. We present observational constraints for the simplest $f\left( Q\right) =f_{0}Q^{n}$ model using data from Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmic Chronometers. For different data combinations we found consistent constraints, with a best-fit value for the power-law index $n\simeq2$. A comparison with the $Λ$CDM model shows that the $f\left( Q\right) $-gravity leads to larger values for the likelihood, while Akaike's Information Criterion suggests statistical equivalence between the two models for most data combinations.

Observational Constraints on Noncoincident $f(Q)$-Gravity with Matter-Gravity Coupling

Abstract

We investigate -gravity with a matter-gravity coupling as a geometric dark energy candidate for the description of the late-time cosmic acceleration within a spatially flat Friedmann--Lemaître-Robertson-Walker geometry. We select a noncoincident connection that naturally follows from the general framework of cosmological models with nonzero spatial curvature. We present observational constraints for the simplest model using data from Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmic Chronometers. For different data combinations we found consistent constraints, with a best-fit value for the power-law index . A comparison with the CDM model shows that the -gravity leads to larger values for the likelihood, while Akaike's Information Criterion suggests statistical equivalence between the two models for most data combinations.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 33 equations, 8 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 11 sections, 33 equations, 8 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Confidence regions of the numerical results of the non-coincidence $f\left( Q\right)$-gravity as derived from the datasets $D_{1}:PP\&BAO$ and $D_{4}:PP\&OHD\&BAO$.
  • Figure 2: Confidence regions of the numerical results of the non-coincidence $f\left( Q\right)$-gravity as derived from the datasets $D_{2}:U3\&BAO$ and $D_{5}:U3\&OHD\&BAO$.
  • Figure 3: Confidence regions of the numerical results of the non-coincidence $f\left( Q\right)$-gravity as derived from the datasets $D_{3}:DD\&BAO$ and $D_{6}:DD\&OHD\&BAO$.
  • Figure 4: Parameter space showing the dynamical evolution of the Hubble function $H\left( z\right)$, the deceleration parameter $q\left( z\right)$, effective dark energy density $\Omega_{DE}\left( z\right)$, the kinetic term of the scalar field $x_{\phi}\left( z\right)$, the connection component $x_{\Psi }\left( z\right)$ and variable $y\left( z\right)$, for the parameter values with the 68% credible intervals derived from the observational constraints of dataset $D_{4}.$
  • Figure 5: Parameter space showing the dynamical evolution of the Hubble function $H\left( z\right)$, the deceleration parameter $q\left( z\right)$, effective dark energy density $\Omega_{DE}\left( z\right)$, the kinetic term of the scalar field $x_{\phi}\left( z\right)$, the connection component $x_{\Psi }\left( z\right)$ and variable $y\left( z\right)$, for the parameter values within the 68% credible intervals derived derived from the observational constraints of dataset $D_{5}.$
  • ...and 3 more figures