Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Proximal Policy Optimization in Path Space: A Schrödinger Bridge Perspective

Yuehu Gong, Zeyuan Wang, Yulin Chen, Yanwei Fu

Abstract

On-policy reinforcement learning with generative policies is promising but remains underexplored. A central challenge is that proximal policy optimization (PPO) is traditionally formulated in terms of action-space probability ratios, whereas diffusion- and flow-based policies are more naturally represented as trajectory-level generative processes. In this work, we propose GSB-PPO, a path-space formulation of generative PPO inspired by the Generalized Schrödinger Bridge (GSB). Our framework lifts PPO-style proximal updates from terminal actions to full generation trajectories, yielding a unified view of on-policy optimization for generative policies. Within this framework, we develop two concrete objectives: a clipping-based objective, GSB-PPO-Clip, and a penalty-based objective, GSB-PPO-Penalty. Experimental results show that while both objectives are compatible with on-policy training, the penalty formulation consistently delivers better stability and performance than the clipping counterpart. Overall, our results highlight path-space proximal regularization as an effective principle for training generative policies with PPO.

Proximal Policy Optimization in Path Space: A Schrödinger Bridge Perspective

Abstract

On-policy reinforcement learning with generative policies is promising but remains underexplored. A central challenge is that proximal policy optimization (PPO) is traditionally formulated in terms of action-space probability ratios, whereas diffusion- and flow-based policies are more naturally represented as trajectory-level generative processes. In this work, we propose GSB-PPO, a path-space formulation of generative PPO inspired by the Generalized Schrödinger Bridge (GSB). Our framework lifts PPO-style proximal updates from terminal actions to full generation trajectories, yielding a unified view of on-policy optimization for generative policies. Within this framework, we develop two concrete objectives: a clipping-based objective, GSB-PPO-Clip, and a penalty-based objective, GSB-PPO-Penalty. Experimental results show that while both objectives are compatible with on-policy training, the penalty formulation consistently delivers better stability and performance than the clipping counterpart. Overall, our results highlight path-space proximal regularization as an effective principle for training generative policies with PPO.
Paper Structure (18 sections, 24 equations, 3 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 18 sections, 24 equations, 3 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Comparison between GSB-PPO and PPO on the 10 playground environments. We report step-return curves over training.
  • Figure 2: Comparison between GSB-PPO and FPO on the 10 playground environments. We report step-return curves over training.
  • Figure 3: KL ablation on CheetahRun.