Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Super-Klein tunneling in 2D Lorentzian-type barriers in graphene

Alonso Contreras-Astorga, Francisco Correa, Luis Inzunza, Vit Jakubsky, Raul Valencia-Torres

Abstract

We introduce a two-dimensional model of spin-1/2 Dirac fermions in graphene subjected to a highly tunable electric field, which exhibits super-Klein tunneling. The electric field can be continuously interpolated between two limiting configurations: a uniform electrostatic Lorentzian barrier with translational invariance and a chain of well-separated electrostatic scatterers. We demonstrate that super-Klein tunneling arises naturally as a direct consequence of the intrinsic connection of the model to free-particle dynamics, a relation that is established through methods of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, which provide an elegant and analytically tractable framework. Besides the mentioned super-Klein tunneling, scale invariance of the model and invisibility of the potential for particles of specific energy are revealed, and possible routes toward experimental realization are discussed.

Super-Klein tunneling in 2D Lorentzian-type barriers in graphene

Abstract

We introduce a two-dimensional model of spin-1/2 Dirac fermions in graphene subjected to a highly tunable electric field, which exhibits super-Klein tunneling. The electric field can be continuously interpolated between two limiting configurations: a uniform electrostatic Lorentzian barrier with translational invariance and a chain of well-separated electrostatic scatterers. We demonstrate that super-Klein tunneling arises naturally as a direct consequence of the intrinsic connection of the model to free-particle dynamics, a relation that is established through methods of supersymmetric quantum mechanics, which provide an elegant and analytically tractable framework. Besides the mentioned super-Klein tunneling, scale invariance of the model and invisibility of the potential for particles of specific energy are revealed, and possible routes toward experimental realization are discussed.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 26 equations, 2 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 4 sections, 26 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: (left column) Potential $\tilde{V}(x,y)$. (middle column) Probability density of $\tilde{\psi}=\mathcal{L}\!\left(\psi_{0}+\psi_{\pi/4}\right)$ together with its current $\vec{j}=(\widetilde{\psi})^{\dag} \vec{\sigma}\widetilde{\psi}$. The red lines in c) are borders of the areas where the probability current changes direction. (Right column) Probability density of localized state $\tilde{\psi}_\beta=\mathcal{L}\psi_\beta$ together with its current $\vec{j}=(\widetilde{\psi}_{\beta})^{\dag} \vec{\sigma}\widetilde{\psi}_{\beta}$ (right column). We fixed a)-c) $\alpha=0$, d)-f) $\alpha=0.25$, g)-i) $\alpha=0.4$ and j)-l) $\alpha=1.64$. In all figures, $m=1$ and $\beta=1$.
  • Figure 2: a) Line-charged tip parallel to the graphene sheet and grounded plate. b) Potential $V_{el}(x,y)$ in (\ref{['potentialel']}) with charge density (\ref{['tau']}) (blue dashed) and $\tilde{V}$ for $\alpha=0$ (red dotted). c) The difference $\frac{|V_{el}-\tilde{V}|}{\hbox{max} \tilde{V}}$. We fixed $z_0=1$, $z_1=3$, $m=0.173$.