Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Activate the Dual Cones: A Tight Reformulation of Conic ACOPF Constraints

Saba Rafiei, Samuel Chevalier

Abstract

By exploiting the observed tightness of dual rotated second-order cone (RSOC) constraints, this paper transforms the dual of a conic ACOPF relaxation into an equivalent, non-conic problem where dual constraints are implicitly enforced through eliminated dual RSOC variables. To accomplish this, we apply the RSOC-based Jabr relaxation of ACOPF, pose its dual, and then show that all dual RSOC constraints must be tight (i.e., active) at optimality. We then construct a reduced dual maximization problem with only non-negativity constraints, avoiding the explicit RSOC inequality constraints. Numerical experiments confirm that the tight formulation recovers the same dual objective values as a mature conic solver (e.g., MOSEK via PowerModels) on various PGLib benchmark test systems (ranging from 3- to 1354-buses). The proposed formulation has useful performance benefits, compared with its conic counterpart, and it allows us to define a bounding function which provides a guaranteed lower bound on system cost. While this paper focuses on demonstrating the correctness and validity of the proposed structural simplification, it lays the groundwork for future GPU-accelerated first-order optimization methods which can exploit the unconstrained nature of the proposed formulation.

Activate the Dual Cones: A Tight Reformulation of Conic ACOPF Constraints

Abstract

By exploiting the observed tightness of dual rotated second-order cone (RSOC) constraints, this paper transforms the dual of a conic ACOPF relaxation into an equivalent, non-conic problem where dual constraints are implicitly enforced through eliminated dual RSOC variables. To accomplish this, we apply the RSOC-based Jabr relaxation of ACOPF, pose its dual, and then show that all dual RSOC constraints must be tight (i.e., active) at optimality. We then construct a reduced dual maximization problem with only non-negativity constraints, avoiding the explicit RSOC inequality constraints. Numerical experiments confirm that the tight formulation recovers the same dual objective values as a mature conic solver (e.g., MOSEK via PowerModels) on various PGLib benchmark test systems (ranging from 3- to 1354-buses). The proposed formulation has useful performance benefits, compared with its conic counterpart, and it allows us to define a bounding function which provides a guaranteed lower bound on system cost. While this paper focuses on demonstrating the correctness and validity of the proposed structural simplification, it lays the groundwork for future GPU-accelerated first-order optimization methods which can exploit the unconstrained nature of the proposed formulation.
Paper Structure (14 sections, 3 theorems, 36 equations, 1 figure, 8 tables)

This paper contains 14 sections, 3 theorems, 36 equations, 1 figure, 8 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

When eq: conic_soln is solved to optimality, the conic inequalities eq: dual_conic_eqs2-eq: dual_conic_eqs4 are tight, i.e., they hold with equality.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Change of dual objective as a function of $\epsilon$. As the stability parameter is swept (log scale), the dual objective value for the 14-bus case increases monotonically.

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Remark 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof