Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the size of k-irreducible triangulations

Vincent Delecroix, Oscar Fontaine, Arnaud de Mesmay

Abstract

A triangulation of a surface is k-irreducible if every non-contractible curve has length at least k and any edge contraction breaks this property. Equivalently, every edge belongs to a non-contractible curve of length k and there are no shorter non-contractible curves. We prove that a k-irreducible triangulation of a surface of genus g has $O(k^2g)$ triangles, which is optimal. This is an improvement over the previous best bound $k^{O(k)} g^2$ of Gao, Richter and Seymour [Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 1996].

On the size of k-irreducible triangulations

Abstract

A triangulation of a surface is k-irreducible if every non-contractible curve has length at least k and any edge contraction breaks this property. Equivalently, every edge belongs to a non-contractible curve of length k and there are no shorter non-contractible curves. We prove that a k-irreducible triangulation of a surface of genus g has triangles, which is optimal. This is an improvement over the previous best bound of Gao, Richter and Seymour [Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 1996].
Paper Structure (9 sections, 12 theorems, 2 equations, 6 figures)

This paper contains 9 sections, 12 theorems, 2 equations, 6 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Any $k$-irreducible triangulation of an orientable surface $S$ of genus $g$ has at most $966 k^2 g = O(k^2 g)$ edges.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: The triangulation in blue, a walk in red, its corresponding noose in green and the medial graph in orange.
  • Figure 2: A smoothing at $v$
  • Figure 3: A graph $G$ in blue on a genus $2$ surface and its medial graph in orange
  • Figure 4: The contraction of an edge in $G$. The blue graph is $G$, the orange one is $\mathcal{C}$ and the red curve is $c$.
  • Figure 5: Wedding of two curves $s$ and $s'$.
  • ...and 1 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (33)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2: schrijver1991decomposition
  • Remark 2.3
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 23 more