Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Envy-Free School Redistricting Between Two Groups

Daisuke Shibatani, Yutaro Yamaguchi

Abstract

We study an application of fair division theory to school redistricting. Procaccia, Robinson, and Tucker-Foltz (SODA 2024) recently proposed a mathematical model to generate redistricting plans that provide theoretically guaranteed fairness among demographic groups of students. They showed that an almost proportional allocation can be found by adding $O(g \log g)$ extra seats in total, where $g$ is the number of groups. In contrast, for three or more groups, adding $o(n)$ extra seats is not sufficient to obtain an almost envy-free allocation in general, where $n$ is the total number of students. In this paper, we focus on the case of two groups. We introduce a relevant relaxation of envy-freeness, termed 1-relaxed envy-freeness, which limits the capacity violation not in total but at each school to at most one. We show that there always exists a 1-relaxed envy-free allocation, which can be found in polynomial time.

Envy-Free School Redistricting Between Two Groups

Abstract

We study an application of fair division theory to school redistricting. Procaccia, Robinson, and Tucker-Foltz (SODA 2024) recently proposed a mathematical model to generate redistricting plans that provide theoretically guaranteed fairness among demographic groups of students. They showed that an almost proportional allocation can be found by adding extra seats in total, where is the number of groups. In contrast, for three or more groups, adding extra seats is not sufficient to obtain an almost envy-free allocation in general, where is the total number of students. In this paper, we focus on the case of two groups. We introduce a relevant relaxation of envy-freeness, termed 1-relaxed envy-freeness, which limits the capacity violation not in total but at each school to at most one. We show that there always exists a 1-relaxed envy-free allocation, which can be found in polynomial time.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 8 theorems, 24 equations, 1 figure, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 10 sections, 8 theorems, 24 equations, 1 figure, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

theorem 1

For any instance of the school redistricting problem with two groups, a 1-relaxed envy-free allocation always exists. Furthermore, such an allocation can be constructed in polynomial time.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Conceptual diagram of the network in Lemma \ref{['lem:d']}

Theorems & Definitions (16)

  • definition 1
  • theorem 1
  • lemma 1
  • proof
  • lemma 2
  • proof
  • lemma 3
  • proof
  • lemma 4
  • proof
  • ...and 6 more