Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Measurement of the elliptic flow of $^3$He and $^3_Λ$H in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.36$ TeV

ALICE Collaboration

Abstract

The first measurement of the elliptic flow coefficient of (anti)${}^3_Λ$H and the study of the $v_2$ of $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ measured in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.36$ TeV with the ALICE detector are presented. Based on the large data sample of approximately five billion events collected in 2023 during the LHC Run 3 data taking, these measurements provide important insights into the production mechanism of (anti)(hyper)nuclei, as well as into the phase-space distributions of nucleons and hyperons produced in heavy-ion collisions. The results are discussed in the context of hydrodynamic and coalescence models, highlighting how the measurement of the elliptic flow of nuclei, such as helium and hypertriton, provides critical constraints on hadronization models.

Measurement of the elliptic flow of $^3$He and $^3_Λ$H in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.36$ TeV

Abstract

The first measurement of the elliptic flow coefficient of (anti)H and the study of the of measured in Pb-Pb collisions at TeV with the ALICE detector are presented. Based on the large data sample of approximately five billion events collected in 2023 during the LHC Run 3 data taking, these measurements provide important insights into the production mechanism of (anti)(hyper)nuclei, as well as into the phase-space distributions of nucleons and hyperons produced in heavy-ion collisions. The results are discussed in the context of hydrodynamic and coalescence models, highlighting how the measurement of the elliptic flow of nuclei, such as helium and hypertriton, provides critical constraints on hadronization models.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 7 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 8 sections, 7 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Invariant-mass distribution of $^{3}_{\Lambda}\mathrm{H}$ candidates (left) and $v_{2}$ as a function of the invariant mass (right), in the $5<p_{\rm T}<8$ GeV/$c$ transverse-momentum interval and the 20--60% centrality interval. In the left panel, the solid red line represents the fit with a DSCB function (signal) while the dotted line displays the fit of the background with a second-order polynomial function. The total fit is shown with the solid blue line. In the right panel, the solid red line represents the fit function described in Eq. \ref{['eq:v2tot']}.
  • Figure 2: Measured $v_2$ of $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm T}$ for the various centrality intervals (left) and comparison with predictions of hydrodynamical models with and without a coalescence afterburner for two selected centrality intervals (right). Error bars represent statistical uncertainties, while boxes indicate systematic uncertainties, respectively. The widths of the model bands represent their statistical uncertainties.
  • Figure 3: Azimuthal distributions of $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ nuclei in the transverse-momentum range $4 \leq p_{\mathrm{T}} < 5.6$ GeV/$c$, fitted with periodic functions including even harmonics up to the fourth order. The experimental data are selected in the 40--60% centrality interval, and the fit includes the second and fourth harmonics (blue line). See the text for details.
  • Figure 4: $v_2$ of $^3\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ (red markers) and hypertriton (blue markers) as a function of $p_{\mathrm T}$ for the 0-20% (left panel) and 20-60% (right panel) centrality intervals. Error bars represent statistical uncertainties, while boxes indicate systematic uncertainties, respectively. The data points are compared with the coalescence model expectations (see the text for details) for the two nuclear species.