Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Furstenberg-type estimates under mild non-concentration assumptions

Tuomas Orponen, Pablo Shmerkin

Abstract

We prove sharp $δ$-discretised versions of some variants of the Furstenberg set problem under weaker or different non-concentration assumptions compared to previous works.

Furstenberg-type estimates under mild non-concentration assumptions

Abstract

We prove sharp -discretised versions of some variants of the Furstenberg set problem under weaker or different non-concentration assumptions compared to previous works.
Paper Structure (13 sections, 13 theorems, 126 equations)

This paper contains 13 sections, 13 theorems, 126 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $s \in (0,1]$, $t \in [0,2]$, and let Then, there exist $\epsilon = \epsilon(s,t,\gamma) > 0$ and $\delta_{0} = \delta_{0}(s,t,\gamma) > 0$ such that the following holds for all $\delta \in (0,\delta_{0}]$. Let $(\mathcal{P},\mathcal{T})$ be a $(\delta,s,\delta^{-\epsilon},M)$-nice configuration, where $\mathcal{P}$ is a Frostman $(\del Moreover, $\delta_0,\epsilon$ can be chosen uniform over

Theorems & Definitions (25)

  • Theorem 1.1: Furstenberg set estimate
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Remark 1.6
  • Remark 1.7
  • Definition 2.1: Frostman and Katz-Tao $(\delta,s,C)$-sets
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • ...and 15 more