Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Robust Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing and Liquidity Management

Bingzheng Chen, Jan Dhaene, Chun Liu, Shunzhi Pang

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic equilibrium model of the insurance market that jointly characterizes insurers' underwriting, investment, recapitalization, and dividend policies under model uncertainty and financial frictions. Competitive insurers maximize shareholder value under a subjective worst-case probability measure, giving rise to liquidity-driven underwriting cycles and flight-to-quality behavior. While an equilibrium typically fails to exist in such dynamic liquidity management framework with external financial investment, we show that incorporating model uncertainty restores equilibrium existence under plausible parameter conditions. Moreover, the model uncovers a novel relationship between the correlation of insurance and financial market risks and the equilibrium insurance price: negative loadings may emerge when insurance gains and financial returns are positively correlated, contrary to conventional intuition.

Robust Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing and Liquidity Management

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic equilibrium model of the insurance market that jointly characterizes insurers' underwriting, investment, recapitalization, and dividend policies under model uncertainty and financial frictions. Competitive insurers maximize shareholder value under a subjective worst-case probability measure, giving rise to liquidity-driven underwriting cycles and flight-to-quality behavior. While an equilibrium typically fails to exist in such dynamic liquidity management framework with external financial investment, we show that incorporating model uncertainty restores equilibrium existence under plausible parameter conditions. Moreover, the model uncovers a novel relationship between the correlation of insurance and financial market risks and the equilibrium insurance price: negative loadings may emerge when insurance gains and financial returns are positively correlated, contrary to conventional intuition.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 3 theorems, 38 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 3 theorems, 38 equations, 9 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

In the presence of model uncertainty, suppose that Assumptions Assumption market-to-book ratio and Assumption Robust hold and that the following system of equations admits a solution for $p^{\ast}(M)$ and $u^{\ast}(M)$ on $[\underline{M}, \overline{M}]$: subject to the boundary conditions: $u(\underline{M}) = 1 + \gamma$, $u(\overline{M}) = 1$, $u^{\prime}(\underline{M}) = u^{\prime}(\overline{M}

Figures (9)

  • Figure 4.1: Equilibrium Outcomes with and without Financial Investment.
  • Figure 4.2: Optimal Density Generators with and without Financial Investment.
  • Figure 4.3: Equilibrium Outcomes for Different Correlation Coefficient $\rho$.
  • Figure 4.4: Equilibrium Outcomes for Different Robustness Degree $\theta$.
  • Figure 4.5: Equilibrium Outcomes for Different Financing Cost $\gamma$.
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (4)

  • Proposition 1: Robust Equilibrium with Model Uncertainty
  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3