Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An automata-based test for bricks over string algebras

Amit Kuber, Annoy Sengupta

Abstract

Motivated by the recent work of Deaconu, Mousavand and Paquette on the connection between infinite string bricks for certain gentle algebras and Sturmian words, we develop a decorated version of a deterministic automaton, called a multi-entry inverse automaton (MIA, for short) that accepts pointed words. We then associate an MIA $\mathsf M_{Λδ}$ over $\{0,1\}$ to a string algebra $Λ$, and show that strings over $Λ$ can be viewed as certain equivalence classes of the pointed words accepted by $\mathsf M_{Λδ}$. By defining (weak) brick words over this MIA, we show that a finite/infinite string module (resp. band module) is a brick if and only if every word in the associated equivalence class of pointed binary words is a brick word (resp. a weak brick word) over $\mathsf M_{Λδ}$. The result of Deaconu et al. follows as an immediate consequence.

An automata-based test for bricks over string algebras

Abstract

Motivated by the recent work of Deaconu, Mousavand and Paquette on the connection between infinite string bricks for certain gentle algebras and Sturmian words, we develop a decorated version of a deterministic automaton, called a multi-entry inverse automaton (MIA, for short) that accepts pointed words. We then associate an MIA over to a string algebra , and show that strings over can be viewed as certain equivalence classes of the pointed words accepted by . By defining (weak) brick words over this MIA, we show that a finite/infinite string module (resp. band module) is a brick if and only if every word in the associated equivalence class of pointed binary words is a brick word (resp. a weak brick word) over . The result of Deaconu et al. follows as an immediate consequence.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 17 theorems, 7 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 17 theorems, 7 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

lothaire1997combinatorics An infinite aperiodic word $\mathsf w$ over $\{\mathsf a,\mathsf b\}$ is Sturmian if there is no finite word $\mathsf w'$ such that both $\mathsf a\mathsf w'\mathsf a$ and $\mathsf b\mathsf w'\mathsf b$ are subwords of $\mathsf w$. A right-infinite Sturmian word $\mathsf w$

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: $\Lambda_N$ with $\rho=\{a_1b_2,a_2b_3,\cdots,a_{N-2}b_{N-1},b_1a_2,b_2a_3,\cdots,b_{N-2}a_{N-1}\}$
  • Figure 2: $\Gamma$ with $\rho=\{a_3bc_1,a_3a_1,c_3c_1\}$
  • Figure 3: The underlying automaton of the MIA associated with the algebra in \ref{['exmp: barbell automaton']}
  • Figure 4: The underlying automaton of the MIA ${\mathsf M_{\Gamma\delta}}$ used in \ref{['exmp: barbell automaton delta']}

Theorems & Definitions (50)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Definition 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • ...and 40 more