Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Weighted Time Averages and Weak Convergence to Equilibrium in Quantum Integrable Systems

Xinyu Liu

Abstract

This paper establishes a natural quantum counterpart of weak equilibration for statistical ensembles in integrable systems. For quantum systems with pure point spectrum, single-time expectation values under unitary evolution are typically quasiperiodic, and hence generally do not admit a pointwise limit as $t\to\infty$. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a weighted time-averaging procedure and prove that the resulting averaged dynamics converge to the diagonal (dephased) equilibrium state. We further illustrate and validate the theoretical result through a three-spin quantum integrable model.

Weighted Time Averages and Weak Convergence to Equilibrium in Quantum Integrable Systems

Abstract

This paper establishes a natural quantum counterpart of weak equilibration for statistical ensembles in integrable systems. For quantum systems with pure point spectrum, single-time expectation values under unitary evolution are typically quasiperiodic, and hence generally do not admit a pointwise limit as . To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a weighted time-averaging procedure and prove that the resulting averaged dynamics converge to the diagonal (dephased) equilibrium state. We further illustrate and validate the theoretical result through a three-spin quantum integrable model.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 6 theorems, 131 equations, 4 figures)

This paper contains 11 sections, 6 theorems, 131 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $H$ be a self-adjoint operator with pure point spectrum, let $\rho_0$ be an initial density operator, and let $A\in \mathcal{B}(\mathcal{H})$ be a bounded observable. Let $\{e_m\}_{m\ge 1}$ be an orthonormal eigenbasis of $H$, satisfying Assume that Then, for any $p,q>0$,

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Compactly supported weight functions $w_{p,q}$ corresponding to the four parameter pairs $(p,q)=(0.5,0.5),(1,1),(2,2),(4,4)$. As $\min\{p,q\}$ increases, the weight becomes increasingly concentrated in the middle portion of the time window and suppresses the endpoint data more strongly.
  • Figure 2: Numerical behavior of the running averages. The upper panel shows the unweighted average and the four weighted averages over the intermediate window $40\le N\le 400$; the lower panel displays the signed deviation from the equilibrium value $0$ on a symlog vertical axis. The purpose of this figure is to highlight the process of approaching equilibrium, rather than the final asymptotic error.
  • Figure 3: Semilogarithmic decay plots of the errors $E_N^{\mathrm{unw}}$ and $E_N^{(p,q)}$ over the asymptotic window $650\le N\le 1200$. The weighted averages clearly outperform the unweighted average; for the present model, larger values of $\min\{p,q\}$ correspond to faster error decay.
  • Figure 4: Linearized test of the stretched-exponential convergence law. For each pair $(p,q)$, we plot $\log_{10}E_N^{(p,q)}$ against $N^{\zeta(p,q)}$, where $\zeta(p,q)=(1+1/\min\{p,q\})^{-1}$. The data points exhibit an approximately linear trend overall, thereby supporting the theoretical prediction $E_N^{(p,q)}\approx \exp(-cN^{\zeta(p,q)})$.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Corollary 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Theorem 4
  • proof
  • Remark 5
  • Proposition 6
  • ...and 3 more