Table of Contents
Fetching ...

PRODIGE -- envelope to disk with NOEMA VIII. Sulfur oxides trace a shock caused by a streamer in the inner envelope of a protostar

María Teresa Valdivia-Mena, Jaime E. Pineda, Caroline Gieser, Paola Caselli, Dominique M. Segura-Cox, Yuxin Lin, María José Maureira, Tien-Hao Hsieh, Laura A. Busch, Ana Lopez-Sepulcre, Laure Bouscasse, Dmitry Semenov, Asunción Fuente, Nichol Cunningham, Thomas Henning, Julián J. Miranzo-Pastor, Yu-Ru Chou, Roberto Neri, Izaskun Jimenez-Serra, Edwige Chapillon, Stephane Guilloteau, Felipe Alves, Mario Tafalla, Anne Dutrey, Riccardo Franceschi, Sierk van Terwisga, Kamber Schwarz

Abstract

(Abridged) Recently, streamers have been observed causing shocks at the outer edge of protoplanetary disks. The study of sulfur-bearing species can help us to understand the physical and chemical changes caused by infalling streamers toward their landing positions. We study the physical properties traced by SO$_2$ and SO toward the Class I protostar Per-emb 50, which is possibly related to the streamer infalling toward its disk. We present new NOEMA A-array observations as part of the large program "Protostars and Disks: Global Evolution" (PRODIGE). We analyzed the morphology of SO$_2$ and SO, and complement our interpretations with additional H_$2$CO and CO data from the same program. We compared the SO$_2$ and SO morphology with an infalling-rotating model. We applied Bayesian model selection to the brightest SO$_2$ line to disentangle the different kinematic components traced by this molecule. We used Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) and non-LTE analyses to determine the temperature and density of the SO$_2$ emission. There are two separate peaks of SO$_2$ emission offset toward the southwest of Per-emb 50, one brighter (peak 1) at about 180 au from the protostar, and a weaker one (peak 2) at about 400 au. Peak 2 is blueshifted with respect to an infalling-rotating envelope. We propose that this peak is caused by the shock between the inner envelope and the streamer. Peak 1 is consistent with the expected envelope motion, and could thus be caused by shocks at the disk-envelope interface, but potential streamer influence cannot be neglected. Both peaks show abundance ratios consistent with a low velocity shock ($\sim 3-4$ \kms) when compared with shock models. Streamers can affect the physical and chemical structure of both disks and envelopes, suggesting that streamers can play an important role in shaping both structures in the embedded stages of star formation.

PRODIGE -- envelope to disk with NOEMA VIII. Sulfur oxides trace a shock caused by a streamer in the inner envelope of a protostar

Abstract

(Abridged) Recently, streamers have been observed causing shocks at the outer edge of protoplanetary disks. The study of sulfur-bearing species can help us to understand the physical and chemical changes caused by infalling streamers toward their landing positions. We study the physical properties traced by SO and SO toward the Class I protostar Per-emb 50, which is possibly related to the streamer infalling toward its disk. We present new NOEMA A-array observations as part of the large program "Protostars and Disks: Global Evolution" (PRODIGE). We analyzed the morphology of SO and SO, and complement our interpretations with additional H_CO and CO data from the same program. We compared the SO and SO morphology with an infalling-rotating model. We applied Bayesian model selection to the brightest SO line to disentangle the different kinematic components traced by this molecule. We used Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE) and non-LTE analyses to determine the temperature and density of the SO emission. There are two separate peaks of SO emission offset toward the southwest of Per-emb 50, one brighter (peak 1) at about 180 au from the protostar, and a weaker one (peak 2) at about 400 au. Peak 2 is blueshifted with respect to an infalling-rotating envelope. We propose that this peak is caused by the shock between the inner envelope and the streamer. Peak 1 is consistent with the expected envelope motion, and could thus be caused by shocks at the disk-envelope interface, but potential streamer influence cannot be neglected. Both peaks show abundance ratios consistent with a low velocity shock ( \kms) when compared with shock models. Streamers can affect the physical and chemical structure of both disks and envelopes, suggesting that streamers can play an important role in shaping both structures in the embedded stages of star formation.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 1 equation, 13 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 15 sections, 1 equation, 13 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: NOEMA observations of molecular emission toward Per-emb 50. Left: Integrated intensity of $\rm \ce{SO2}$$11_{1,11}-10_{0,10}$ between 6.5 and 12 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$. Black crosses show the locations of the $\rm \ce{SO2}$ peaks, labeled as peak 1 and peak 2. Cyan contours represent the $\rm \ce{H2CO}$$3_{0,3} - 2_{0,2}$ integrated intensity between 5 and 8 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$, drawn in steps of 3, 5 and 10 times rms of the integrated image (0.7 K ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$). Right: Integreated intensity of SO $5_{5} - 4_{4}$ between 0 and 13 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$. Red and cyan contours are CO integrated intensity in redshifted and blueshifted channels, respectively, with respect to the protostar's $\rm v_{\mathrm{LSR}}$ (7.5 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$). Blueshifted channels are integrated between -4.3 and 5.3 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$, whereas redshifted channels are between 10 and 20 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$. Contours are drawn at 5 to 45 times the rms of the integrated images (4.7 K ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$) in steps of 10. Red and blue arrows indicate the direction of the outflow. The dashed line represents the direction of the PV diagram in Fig. \ref{['fig:SO2pvdiag']}. The white star marks the position of the continuum peak. The filled white ellipse represents the beam size. A scalebar in the bottom right corner represents a physical scale of 200 au.
  • Figure 2: Position velocity diagrams of $\rm \ce{SO2}$ and SO using the path shown in Fig. \ref{['fig:mom0wh2co']}. $\rm \ce{SO2}$ transitions are in order of increasing upper energy levels $E_{\mathrm{up}}$ From left to right: $\rm \ce{SO2}$$4_{2,2}-3_{1,3}$, $\rm \ce{SO2}$$11_{1,11}-10_{0,10}$, $\rm \ce{SO2}$$12_{3,9}-12_{2,10}$, SO $5_{5} - 4_{4}$. White contours show the normalized intensity PV diagrams for an infalling-rotating envelope, obtained with FERIA Oya2022FERIA.
  • Figure 3: Spectra of SO $5_{5} - 4_{4}$ (blue) and $\rm \ce{SO2}$$11_{1,11}-10_{0,10}$ (gray) at the two resolved peak positions, together with the spectra obtained from FERIA, normalized to the SO intensity at the peak velocity of the IRE. The vertical dashed-dotted line marks the systemic velocity of the protostar (7.5 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$), whereas the thick dashed line marks the velocity of the streamer at the same distance from the protostar (in radius) as peak 2 (6.45 ${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$, Appendix \ref{['ap:streamerH2CO']}).
  • Figure 4: $\rm \ce{SO2}$ spectra (gray) at the location of the peaks together with the best fit (black dashed lines) Gaussian models. Peak 1 has two Gaussian components, a narrow (orange, $\sigma_v<1.8$${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$) and a wide (blue, $\sigma_v>1.8$${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$), whereas peak 2 has just one component (narrow).
  • Figure 5: Peak main beam temperatures (top), central velocities (middle) and velocity dispersions (bottom) of the $\rm \ce{SO2}$ Gaussian components, separated into $\sigma_v\leq1.8$${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$ (left) and $\sigma_v>1.8$${\rm km\, s^{-1}}$ (right). The images in the right column focus on a region approximately 250 au in radius from the protostar. Blue and red arrows mark the direction of the outflow. Black ellipses represent the beam size. Crosses (black and white) represent the locations of the $\rm \ce{SO2}$ peaks. A scalebar indicates a length of 200 au.
  • ...and 8 more figures