Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Pinching rigidity theorems for normal scalar curvature

Jianquan Ge, Fagui Li, Yunheng Zhang

Abstract

Let $M^n$ be an $n$-dimensional closed minimal submanifold immersed in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^{n+m}$. Denote by $S$ and $ρ^{\perp}$ the squared norm of the second fundamental form and the normal scalar curvature of $M^n$, respectively. Let $\{A^α\}_{α=n+1}^{n+m}$ be the shape operators of $M^n$ with respect to a local orthonormal normal frame. Denote by $λ_{1}$ the largest eigenvalue of the positive semi-definite symmetric matrix $\mathcal{A}=(\langle A^α,A^β\rangle)_{m\times m}$. We show that if $λ_{1}\leqslant n$ and $ρ^{\perp}\leqslant \left[{\sqrt{2}n(n-1)}\right]^{-1} \mathop{\inf}\limits_{p\in M}(n-λ_{1})(p)$, then $ρ^{\perp}\equiv 0$, which means the normal bundle of $M^n$ is flat, and further we give the classification of $M^n$.

Pinching rigidity theorems for normal scalar curvature

Abstract

Let be an -dimensional closed minimal submanifold immersed in the unit sphere . Denote by and the squared norm of the second fundamental form and the normal scalar curvature of , respectively. Let be the shape operators of with respect to a local orthonormal normal frame. Denote by the largest eigenvalue of the positive semi-definite symmetric matrix . We show that if and , then , which means the normal bundle of is flat, and further we give the classification of .
Paper Structure (4 sections, 17 theorems, 74 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 17 theorems, 74 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $M^n$ be an $n$-dimensional closed minimal submanifold immersed in the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^{n+m}$. If $\lambda_{1}\leqslant n$ and $\rho^{\perp}\leqslant\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}n(n-1)}\mathop{\inf}\limits_{p\in M}(n-\lambda_{1})(p)$, then $M^n$ must be one of the following:

Theorems & Definitions (29)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Corollary 1.4
  • Theorem 2.1: DDVV inequality GTLu
  • Theorem 2.2: Böttcher-Wenzel inequality Lu
  • Theorem 2.3: 1992 LiLiCX93
  • Corollary 2.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 19 more