Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Steenrod square on Khovanov homology and a cup-i product

Advika Rajapakse

Abstract

Lipshitz-Sarkar defined a stable homotopy type refining Khovanov homology, producing cohomology operations $\text{Sq}^i$ on the Khovanov homology $Kh(L)$ of a link $L$. Later, Morán proposed a sequence of cup-i products on the $\mathbb{F}_2$-coefficient cochain complex of any augmented semi-simplicial object in the Burnside category. Applied to the Khovanov functor, he obtained another sequence of operations $\mathfrak{sq}^n$ on $Kh(L)$, where $\mathfrak{sq}^0$, $\mathfrak{sq}^1$ agree with the usual Steenrod squares. We prove that Lipshitz-Sarkar's $\text{Sq}^2$, the first Steenrod operation that cannot be computed from merely homological data, agrees with Morán's $\mathfrak{sq}^2$.

A Steenrod square on Khovanov homology and a cup-i product

Abstract

Lipshitz-Sarkar defined a stable homotopy type refining Khovanov homology, producing cohomology operations on the Khovanov homology of a link . Later, Morán proposed a sequence of cup-i products on the -coefficient cochain complex of any augmented semi-simplicial object in the Burnside category. Applied to the Khovanov functor, he obtained another sequence of operations on , where , agree with the usual Steenrod squares. We prove that Lipshitz-Sarkar's , the first Steenrod operation that cannot be computed from merely homological data, agrees with Morán's .
Paper Structure (14 sections, 22 theorems, 108 equations, 7 figures)

This paper contains 14 sections, 22 theorems, 108 equations, 7 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $X_\bullet = \Lambda(F)$. With the canonical identification $\Sigma C^*(X_\bullet;\mathbb{F}_2)\cong C^*(\mathop{\mathrm{Tot}}\nolimits F;\mathbb{F}_2)$, the operations agree.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Left: the elements $s,t$ in the span $\partial_{ab} = \partial_{ab}(z)$ The thick arrows denote the spans $\partial^{n+2}_{a},\partial^{n+2}_{b},\partial^{n+1}_{b-1},\partial^{n+1}_{a}$, . Right: We write both $s$ and $t$ as compositions in $\partial_{b-1}\circ\partial_a$ (composing along the left side of the diagram) or in $\partial_{a}\circ\partial_b$ (composing along the right side of the diagram).
  • Figure 2: We can write a span element $s:z\to x$ either as a composition in $\partial_b$.
  • Figure 3: Left: A degenerate chord presentation $\overline{\mathcal{C}}(z,\alpha)$, for $\alpha$ a cocycle. There are two chords between $b$ and $e$, so the chord is labeled with a "$2$" to show multiplicity. Right: A chord presentation $\mathcal{C}(z,\alpha)$. Note the even number of chords coming out of each index.
  • Figure 4: The types of chord pairs in $\overline{\mathcal{C}}(z,\alpha)$ counted in the interior summand of Equation (\ref{['ab+cd rewritten']}). Left: a chord pair of type \ref{['type 1']}. Middle: a chord pair of type \ref{['type 2r']}. Right: a chord pair of type \ref{['type 2l']}.
  • Figure 5: We draw two cycles of chords (one solid, one dotted) corresponding to two graph cycles $K,K'\subset \Gamma(z,\alpha)$. Note how these two cycles have even intersection number, as they always should. We compute $\#(\mathcal{C}(K)\cap\mathcal{C}(K'))$ by adding the internal crossings in each cycle.
  • ...and 2 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (54)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Definition 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5: MR3252965,rajapakse2025
  • Definition 2.7
  • Remark 2.7.1
  • Definition 3.3
  • Definition 3.4
  • ...and 44 more