Rethinking Frequency Control in Power Systems

Abstract

Frequency control in power systems is implemented in a hierarchical structure traditionally known as primary frequency control (PFC), secondary frequency control (SFC) and tertiary control reserve (TCR) and, some jurisdictions, include time error control (TEC) as well. This hierarchical structure has been designed around a century ago based on timescales separation, that is, approximately an order of magnitude difference between each control structure. This paper argues, based on real-world observations as well as detailed dynamic simulations on a model of the All-Island power system (AIPS) of Ireland, that this frequency control structure is not necessary in current and future converter-dominated power grids. The paper proposes to redesign this structure by removing the SFC and TCR and rely on PFC and a real-time energy market. The PFC is responsible for addressing fast power imbalances in timescales of tens of ms to few minutes (e.g., 100 ms to 5 minutes) while the real-time energy market is responsible for addressing longer imbalances in timescales of minutes to hours (e.g., 5 minutes to 1 hour). TEC, on the other hand, is considered as optional.

Figures (13)

• Figure 1: Illustration of timescales of frequency control (adapted from 9762253).
• Figure 2: Illustration of ENTSO-E standard products (adapted from nextreserves).
• Figure 3: $\sigma_{f}$ in recent years in CE and different North American systems nercercot.
• Figure 4: Frequency traces of the AIPS with & without wind PFC.
• Figure 5: Frequency traces for one hour in the TAS power system with (08:30 a.m to 09:30 a.m) and without (01:30 a.m to 02:30 a.m) HVDC PFC.