Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Prices vs. Quantities: Robust Regulation

Zi Yang Kang

Abstract

This paper revisits the classic instrument choice problem in a setting with consumption externalities, through the lens of robust mechanism design. A regulator can implement any incentive-compatible policy but is uncertain about how individual demand is correlated with marginal externalities, and evaluates policies by worst-case welfare. The optimal policy is a quantity control: a floor for positive externalities and a ceiling for negative externalities. If the sign of the correlation is known, a uniform tax or subsidy can be optimal. The framework also applies to regulatory uncertainty and costly screening, providing a welfare-based explanation for the prevalence of non-price policies.

Prices vs. Quantities: Robust Regulation

Abstract

This paper revisits the classic instrument choice problem in a setting with consumption externalities, through the lens of robust mechanism design. A regulator can implement any incentive-compatible policy but is uncertain about how individual demand is correlated with marginal externalities, and evaluates policies by worst-case welfare. The optimal policy is a quantity control: a floor for positive externalities and a ceiling for negative externalities. If the sign of the correlation is known, a uniform tax or subsidy can be optimal. The framework also applies to regulatory uncertainty and costly screening, providing a welfare-based explanation for the prevalence of non-price policies.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 8 theorems, 49 equations)

This paper contains 24 sections, 8 theorems, 49 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Define Then an allocation function $q:\Theta\times\mathbb{R}_+\to[0,A]$ is implementable only if there exists $\hat{q}\in\mathcal{Q}$ such that $q(\theta,\xi)=\hat{q}(\theta)$ for almost every $(\theta,\xi)\in\Theta\times\mathbb{R}_+$.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Lemma 1
  • Theorem 1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 1
  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3