Table of Contents
Fetching ...

DMD Prediction of MIMO Channel Using Tucker Decomposition

Irina Kopnina, Dmitry Artemasov, Sergey Matveev

Abstract

Accurate channel state information (CSI) prediction is crucial for next-generation multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems. Classical prediction methods often become inefficient for high-dimensional and rapidly time-varying channels. To improve prediction efficiency, it is essential to exploit the inherent low-rank tensor structure of the MIMO channel. Motivated by this observation, we propose a dynamic mode decomposition (DMD)-based prediction framework operating on the low-dimensional core tensors obtained via a Tucker decomposition. The proposed method predicts reduced-order channel cores, significantly lowering computational complexity. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach preserves the dominant channel dynamics and achieves high prediction accuracy.

DMD Prediction of MIMO Channel Using Tucker Decomposition

Abstract

Accurate channel state information (CSI) prediction is crucial for next-generation multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication systems. Classical prediction methods often become inefficient for high-dimensional and rapidly time-varying channels. To improve prediction efficiency, it is essential to exploit the inherent low-rank tensor structure of the MIMO channel. Motivated by this observation, we propose a dynamic mode decomposition (DMD)-based prediction framework operating on the low-dimensional core tensors obtained via a Tucker decomposition. The proposed method predicts reduced-order channel cores, significantly lowering computational complexity. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach preserves the dominant channel dynamics and achieves high prediction accuracy.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 22 equations, 3 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 15 sections, 22 equations, 3 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Channel prediction performance for different prediction horizons with a fixed channel measurement period ${T_p=5\:\mathrm{ms}}$ and under SNR = 30 dB
  • Figure 2: Channel prediction performance for different SNR values at a fixed prediction horizon $\tau=5$ and a fixed channel measurement period $T_p=5\:\mathrm{ms}$
  • Figure 3: Channel prediction performance for different channel measurement periods under noiseless conditions at a fixed prediction horizon, $\tau=5$