Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Robust Building Damage Detection in Cross-Disaster Settings Using Domain Adaptation

Asmae Mouradi, Shruti Kshirsagar

Abstract

Rapid structural damage assessment from remote sensing imagery is essential for timely disaster response. Within human-machine systems (HMS) for disaster management, automated damage detection provides decision-makers with actionable situational awareness. However, models trained on multi-disaster benchmarks often underperform in unseen geographic regions due to domain shift - a distributional mismatch between training and deployment data that undermines human trust in automated assessments. We explore a two-stage ensemble approach using supervised domain adaptation (SDA) for building damage classification across four severity classes. The pipeline adapts the xView2 first-place method to the Ida-BD dataset using SDA and systematically investigates the effect of individual augmentation components on classification performance. Comprehensive ablation experiments on the unseen Ida-BD test split demonstrate that SDA is indispensable: removing it causes damage detection to fail entirely. Our pipeline achieves the most robust performance using SDA with unsharp-enhanced RGB input, attaining a Macro-F1 of 0.5552. These results underscore the critical role of domain adaptation in building trustworthy automated damage assessment modules for HMS-integrated disaster response.

Robust Building Damage Detection in Cross-Disaster Settings Using Domain Adaptation

Abstract

Rapid structural damage assessment from remote sensing imagery is essential for timely disaster response. Within human-machine systems (HMS) for disaster management, automated damage detection provides decision-makers with actionable situational awareness. However, models trained on multi-disaster benchmarks often underperform in unseen geographic regions due to domain shift - a distributional mismatch between training and deployment data that undermines human trust in automated assessments. We explore a two-stage ensemble approach using supervised domain adaptation (SDA) for building damage classification across four severity classes. The pipeline adapts the xView2 first-place method to the Ida-BD dataset using SDA and systematically investigates the effect of individual augmentation components on classification performance. Comprehensive ablation experiments on the unseen Ida-BD test split demonstrate that SDA is indispensable: removing it causes damage detection to fail entirely. Our pipeline achieves the most robust performance using SDA with unsharp-enhanced RGB input, attaining a Macro-F1 of 0.5552. These results underscore the critical role of domain adaptation in building trustworthy automated damage assessment modules for HMS-integrated disaster response.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Overview of the proposed two-stage pipeline for damage classification. Both stages incorporate fusion augmentation and supervised domain adaptation
  • Figure 2: Example from the Ida-BD dataset: pre-disaster image, post-disaster image, and building damage annotation mask.
  • Figure 3: Qualitative comparison of Stage-1 building localization: (a) pre-disaster image, (b) localization result without domain adaptation, and (c) localization result with supervised domain adaptation
  • Figure 4: Qualitative damage detection result using RGB + Unsharp + SDA: (a) pre-disaster image, (b) post-disaster image, and (c) predicted damage mask (green: no damage, yellow: minor, orange: major, red: destroyed).