Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Real-Time Neuro-Symbolic Ethical Governor for Safe Decision Control in Autonomous Robotic Manipulation

Aueaphum Aueawatthanaphisut, Kuepon Aueawatthanaphisut

Abstract

Ethical decision governance has become a critical requirement for autonomous robotic systems operating in human-centered and safety-sensitive environments. This paper presents a real-time neuro-symbolic ethical governor designed to enable risk-aware supervisory control in autonomous robotic manipulation tasks. The proposed framework integrates transformer-based ethical reasoning with a probabilistic ethical risk field formulation and a threshold-based override control mechanism. language-grounded ethical intent inference capability is learned from natural language task descriptions using a fine-tuned DistilBERT model trained on the ETHICS commonsense dataset. A continuous ethical risk metric is subsequently derived from predicted unsafe action probability, confidence uncertainty, and probabilistic variance to support adaptive decision filtering. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated through simulated autonomous robot-arm task scenarios involving varying levels of human proximity and operational hazard. Experimental results demonstrate stable model convergence, reliable ethical risk discrimination, and improved safety-aware decision outcomes without significant degradation of task execution efficiency. The proposed neuro-symbolic architecture further provides enhanced interpretability compared with purely data-driven safety filters, enabling transparent ethical reasoning in real-time control loops. The findings suggest that ethical decision governance can be effectively modeled as a dynamic supervisory risk layer for autonomous robotic systems, with potential applicability to broader cyber-physical and assistive robotics domains.

A Real-Time Neuro-Symbolic Ethical Governor for Safe Decision Control in Autonomous Robotic Manipulation

Abstract

Ethical decision governance has become a critical requirement for autonomous robotic systems operating in human-centered and safety-sensitive environments. This paper presents a real-time neuro-symbolic ethical governor designed to enable risk-aware supervisory control in autonomous robotic manipulation tasks. The proposed framework integrates transformer-based ethical reasoning with a probabilistic ethical risk field formulation and a threshold-based override control mechanism. language-grounded ethical intent inference capability is learned from natural language task descriptions using a fine-tuned DistilBERT model trained on the ETHICS commonsense dataset. A continuous ethical risk metric is subsequently derived from predicted unsafe action probability, confidence uncertainty, and probabilistic variance to support adaptive decision filtering. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated through simulated autonomous robot-arm task scenarios involving varying levels of human proximity and operational hazard. Experimental results demonstrate stable model convergence, reliable ethical risk discrimination, and improved safety-aware decision outcomes without significant degradation of task execution efficiency. The proposed neuro-symbolic architecture further provides enhanced interpretability compared with purely data-driven safety filters, enabling transparent ethical reasoning in real-time control loops. The findings suggest that ethical decision governance can be effectively modeled as a dynamic supervisory risk layer for autonomous robotic systems, with potential applicability to broader cyber-physical and assistive robotics domains.
Paper Structure (11 sections, 5 equations, 6 figures, 1 algorithm)

This paper contains 11 sections, 5 equations, 6 figures, 1 algorithm.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: Architectural block diagram of the robotic control system incorporating an embedded Consequence Engine for safety-critical and ethical reasoning.
  • Figure 2: System architecture of the proposed neuro-symbolic ethical governor for real-time safety-aware autonomous robotic manipulation.
  • Figure 3: Training loss curve
  • Figure 4: Validation loss per epoch
  • Figure 5: Ethical decision classification confusion matrix
  • ...and 1 more figures