Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Grassroots Bonds: A Grassroots Foundation for Market Liquidity

Ehud Shapiro

Abstract

Global cryptocurrencies are unbacked and have high transaction cost incurred by global consensus. In contrast, grassroots cryptocurrencies are backed by the goods and services of their issuers -- any person, natural or legal -- and have no transaction cost beyond operating a smartphone. Liquidity in grassroots cryptocurrencies arises from mutual credit via coin exchange among issuers. However, as grassroots coins are redeemable 1-for-1 against any other grassroots coin, the credit-forming exchange must also be 1-for-1, lest prompt redemption after exchange would leave the parties with undue profit or loss. Thus, grassroots coins are incongruent with liquidity through interest-bearing credit. Here we introduce grassroots bonds, which extend grassroots coins with a maturity date, reframing grassroots coins -- cash -- as mature grassroots bonds. Bond redemption generalises coin redemption, allowing the lending of liquid coins in exchange for interest-bearing future-maturity bonds. We show that digital social contracts -- voluntary agreements among persons, specified, fulfilled, and enforced digitally -- can express the full gamut of financial instruments as the voluntary swap of grassroots bonds, including credit lines, loans, sale of debt, forward contracts, options, and escrow-based instruments, and that classical liquidity ratios are applicable just as well to grassroots bonds. Grassroots bonds may thus allow local digital economies to form and grow without initial capital or external credit, harnessing mutual trust within communities into liquidity. The formal specification presented here was used by AI to derive a working implementation of grassroots bonds in GLP, a concurrent logic programming language implemented in Dart for smartphone deployment. The implementation is illustrated by a running multiagent village market scenario, also implemented in GLP by AI.

Grassroots Bonds: A Grassroots Foundation for Market Liquidity

Abstract

Global cryptocurrencies are unbacked and have high transaction cost incurred by global consensus. In contrast, grassroots cryptocurrencies are backed by the goods and services of their issuers -- any person, natural or legal -- and have no transaction cost beyond operating a smartphone. Liquidity in grassroots cryptocurrencies arises from mutual credit via coin exchange among issuers. However, as grassroots coins are redeemable 1-for-1 against any other grassroots coin, the credit-forming exchange must also be 1-for-1, lest prompt redemption after exchange would leave the parties with undue profit or loss. Thus, grassroots coins are incongruent with liquidity through interest-bearing credit. Here we introduce grassroots bonds, which extend grassroots coins with a maturity date, reframing grassroots coins -- cash -- as mature grassroots bonds. Bond redemption generalises coin redemption, allowing the lending of liquid coins in exchange for interest-bearing future-maturity bonds. We show that digital social contracts -- voluntary agreements among persons, specified, fulfilled, and enforced digitally -- can express the full gamut of financial instruments as the voluntary swap of grassroots bonds, including credit lines, loans, sale of debt, forward contracts, options, and escrow-based instruments, and that classical liquidity ratios are applicable just as well to grassroots bonds. Grassroots bonds may thus allow local digital economies to form and grow without initial capital or external credit, harnessing mutual trust within communities into liquidity. The formal specification presented here was used by AI to derive a working implementation of grassroots bonds in GLP, a concurrent logic programming language implemented in Dart for smartphone deployment. The implementation is illustrated by a running multiagent village market scenario, also implemented in GLP by AI.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 3 theorems, 4 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 22 sections, 3 theorems, 4 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

proposition 1

A transactions-based protocol is oblivious.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Village Market: six-agent grassroots bond economy. Each panel shows one agent's narrative trace. The scenario exercises symmetric mutual credit, asymmetric credit (loans with interest), pay, portfolio swap, escrow (time-release), redeem, and sale of debt. All agents run concurrently as GLP processes; the trace is produced by a running GLP program, the key part of it shown in Appendix \ref{['app:agent']}.

Theorems & Definitions (18)

  • definition 1: Grassroots Bonds
  • definition 2: Configuration, Transaction, Volitional Transaction
  • definition 3: Grassroots Bonds Volitional Transactions
  • definition 4: Transition System, Computation, Run
  • definition 5: Degree
  • definition 6: Multiagent Transition System
  • definition 7: Transaction Closure
  • definition 8: Transactions-Based Multiagent Transition System
  • definition 9: Local-States Function
  • definition 10: Protocol
  • ...and 8 more