Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multiplicity of Equilibria in the War of Attrition with Two-Sided Asymmetric Information

Martin Castillo-Quintana, Gianfranco Miranda-Romero

Abstract

The war of attrition with two-sided asymmetric information is a foundational model in political economy, yet it generically admits a continuum of perfect Bayesian equilibria. This paper characterizes the sources of equilibrium multiplicity. We identify conditions on the type distribution that determine which form of multiplicity arises: when the lower limit of the hazard potential -- the integral of the hazard rate normalized by type -- diverges, the free parameter is the relative aggressiveness of strategies; when that limit is finite, the free parameter is the mass of types conceding immediately. We prove that the Amann-Leininger payoff perturbation and the introduction of behavioral types -- two seemingly distinct refinements -- are mathematically equivalent and succeed in selecting a unique equilibrium if and only if the type support is bounded. For unbounded supports, multiplicity persists. These results provide guidance for applied theorists: choosing distributions with bounded support ensures existing refinements deliver unique predictions.

Multiplicity of Equilibria in the War of Attrition with Two-Sided Asymmetric Information

Abstract

The war of attrition with two-sided asymmetric information is a foundational model in political economy, yet it generically admits a continuum of perfect Bayesian equilibria. This paper characterizes the sources of equilibrium multiplicity. We identify conditions on the type distribution that determine which form of multiplicity arises: when the lower limit of the hazard potential -- the integral of the hazard rate normalized by type -- diverges, the free parameter is the relative aggressiveness of strategies; when that limit is finite, the free parameter is the mass of types conceding immediately. We prove that the Amann-Leininger payoff perturbation and the introduction of behavioral types -- two seemingly distinct refinements -- are mathematically equivalent and succeed in selecting a unique equilibrium if and only if the type support is bounded. For unbounded supports, multiplicity persists. These results provide guidance for applied theorists: choosing distributions with bounded support ensures existing refinements deliver unique predictions.
Paper Structure (31 sections, 12 theorems, 37 equations, 3 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 31 sections, 12 theorems, 37 equations, 3 figures, 4 tables.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $(\sigma_1, \sigma_2)$ be an equilibrium. Wherever $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ are finite, they are (i) non-decreasing and (ii) continuous.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: Equilibrium strategies for $F\sim \mathrm{Exp}(\lambda)$ with $\gamma=1/3$.
  • Figure 2: Equilibrium strategies for $F\sim U(0,1)$ with $\gamma=2$.
  • Figure 3: Equilibrium strategies for $F\sim\mathrm{Pareto}(\underline{\theta},\alpha)$ with $\underline{\theta}=1$, $\alpha=1$, $\underline{\theta}_1=2$.

Theorems & Definitions (27)

  • Remark 1: Pure Strategies
  • Lemma 1: Monotonicity and Continuity; fudenberg1986theory
  • Lemma 2: Strict Monotonicity in the Interior
  • Lemma 3: At Most One Side Concedes at Zero; hendricks1988war
  • Lemma 4: At Most One Side Fights Forever
  • Lemma 5: Differentiability
  • Lemma 6: ODE Characterization; amann1996asymmetric
  • Definition 1: Admissible Type-to-Type Function
  • Proposition 1: Sufficiency
  • Lemma 7: Integral Identity
  • ...and 17 more