Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Real Hochschild homology as an equivariant Loday construction

Ayelet Lindenstrauss, Birgit Richter, Foling Zou

Abstract

Equivariant Loday constructions are a means for providing geometric interpretations of equivariant homology theories. They are usually constructed for a simplicial $G$-set and a $G$-Tambara functor. We study situations where -- depending on the isotropy subgroups occurring in the simplicial $G$-set -- one can work with $H$-Tambara functors for a suitable subgroup $H$ of $G$. We apply this to give an interpretation of Real Hochschild homology of discrete $E_σ$-rings as equivariant Loday constructions where we consider $2m$-gons with a geometrically defined action of the dihedral groups $D_{2m}$ for all $m \geq 1$. The action of symmetric groups on $1$-skeleta of permutohedra also gives examples with isotropy groups $C_2$.

Real Hochschild homology as an equivariant Loday construction

Abstract

Equivariant Loday constructions are a means for providing geometric interpretations of equivariant homology theories. They are usually constructed for a simplicial -set and a -Tambara functor. We study situations where -- depending on the isotropy subgroups occurring in the simplicial -set -- one can work with -Tambara functors for a suitable subgroup of . We apply this to give an interpretation of Real Hochschild homology of discrete -rings as equivariant Loday constructions where we consider -gons with a geometrically defined action of the dihedral groups for all . The action of symmetric groups on -skeleta of permutohedra also gives examples with isotropy groups .
Paper Structure (10 sections, 17 theorems, 98 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 17 theorems, 98 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Assume that $H$ and $H'$ are finite groups and that $\varphi \colon H \rightarrow H'$ is an isomorphism. Let ${\underline{R}}$ be a $H'$-Tambara functor. Then the assignment gives rise to an $H$-Tambara functor $\varphi^*{\underline{R}}$.

Theorems & Definitions (45)

  • Lemma 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 2.2
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Proposition 3.3
  • proof
  • ...and 35 more