Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Reservoir Autoencoder for Blind Decryption: Two-Phase Protocol and Noise Resilience

Hikaru Wakaura, Taiki Tanimae

Abstract

We instantiate the quantum reservoir autoencoder (QRA) with a noise-induced reservoir employing reset noise channels and address two open problems: noise-resilient reversibility and blind decryption. For a single-ciphertext protocol with 10 data qubits and random (non-optimized) reset probabilities, the open-system reservoir suppresses shot-noise sensitivity by ten orders of magnitude, yielding mean-squared error (MSE) $\sim 10^{-14}$ compared with $\sim 10^{-3}$ without reset channels ($N_{\mathrm{shots}} = 1000$). A two-phase protocol trains per-position decoding weights from $M$ shared training plaintexts and decrypts previously unseen messages at MSE $\sim 10^{-4}$, with no statistically significant performance difference among ideal, shot-noise, and reset-plus-shot-noise conditions ($p > 0.05$, 16 seeds). Experiments at $N_q = 5$, 7, and 10 reveal a sharp phase transition at plaintext length $N_c \approx N_q(N_q{+}1)/2 + 8$, providing a design rule for the minimum qubit count. Two blind decoder variants that lack ground-truth targets -- a single-ciphertext cross-path iteration (MSE $\approx 0.3$) and a multi-sample regression variant (MSE $\approx 0.53$, worse than random) -- establish that shared training data is the irreducible requirement for blind decryption. A comparison with variational quantum circuit baselines shows that the fixed-reservoir analytic-readout architecture is dramatically more noise-robust: a quantum recurrent neural network protocol is completely destroyed under depolarizing noise, whereas the QRA remains invariant.

Quantum Reservoir Autoencoder for Blind Decryption: Two-Phase Protocol and Noise Resilience

Abstract

We instantiate the quantum reservoir autoencoder (QRA) with a noise-induced reservoir employing reset noise channels and address two open problems: noise-resilient reversibility and blind decryption. For a single-ciphertext protocol with 10 data qubits and random (non-optimized) reset probabilities, the open-system reservoir suppresses shot-noise sensitivity by ten orders of magnitude, yielding mean-squared error (MSE) compared with without reset channels (). A two-phase protocol trains per-position decoding weights from shared training plaintexts and decrypts previously unseen messages at MSE , with no statistically significant performance difference among ideal, shot-noise, and reset-plus-shot-noise conditions (, 16 seeds). Experiments at , 7, and 10 reveal a sharp phase transition at plaintext length , providing a design rule for the minimum qubit count. Two blind decoder variants that lack ground-truth targets -- a single-ciphertext cross-path iteration (MSE ) and a multi-sample regression variant (MSE , worse than random) -- establish that shared training data is the irreducible requirement for blind decryption. A comparison with variational quantum circuit baselines shows that the fixed-reservoir analytic-readout architecture is dramatically more noise-robust: a quantum recurrent neural network protocol is completely destroyed under depolarizing noise, whereas the QRA remains invariant.
Paper Structure (45 sections, 15 equations, 19 figures, 10 tables)

This paper contains 45 sections, 15 equations, 19 figures, 10 tables.

Figures (19)

  • Figure 1: Single-C protocol under ideal conditions (Exp 1, Path 1). Decryption MSE versus ALS iteration for $N_c = 5$ to 35. Shaded regions indicate $\pm 1$ standard deviation across 16 seeds $\times$ 3 trials. All curves converge to machine precision within one iteration.
  • Figure 2: Single-C protocol under shot noise (Exp 3, $N_{\mathrm{shots}} = 1000$, Path 1). The MSE reaches a noise floor after $\sim$5 iterations. Shaded regions indicate $\pm 1$ standard deviation.
  • Figure 3: Single-C protocol under reset + shot noise (Exp 5, Path 1). Despite the presence of both reset noise channels and shot noise, the MSE reaches $\sim 10^{-14}$--$10^{-12}$, close to the ideal limit. Shaded regions indicate $\pm 1$ standard deviation across 16 seeds $\times$ 3 trials.
  • Figure 4: Unified comparison of Single-C final MSE (mean $\pm$ s.d.) under three noise conditions. The three regimes span 15 orders of magnitude, with Reset+Shot (QRA) achieving precision within 3 orders of the Ideal.
  • Figure 5: Two-phase protocol under ideal conditions (Exp 2, Path 1). Blind decryption MSE versus number of training plaintexts $M$, for $N_c = 5$ to 35. Shaded regions indicate $\pm 1$ standard deviation across 16 seeds.
  • ...and 14 more figures