Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Evil Twins in Sums of Wildflowers

Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo, Stephen Zhou

Abstract

A game $G$ is said to have the evil twin property if there exists $G^* \in \{G,G+*\}$ such that $o^+(G) = o^-(G^*)$ and $o^+(G^*) = o^-(G)$. We study sums of wildflowers, games of form $G:H$. We find that a large closed set of sums of wildflowers has the evil twin property, extending work of McKay--Milley--Nowakowski and Lo. Our argument partially generalizes the misère genus theory of Conway to partizan games, and requires proving several general theorems on ways to extend sets with the evil twin property. Many sums of mutant flowers of the form $\{*x_1,\dots,*x_n\}:a$, where $a$ is a number, also have the evil twin property. We also prove that this set of mutant flowers is the largest such closed set with the evil twin property, and that it is $\mathsf{NP\text{-}hard}$ to compute the outcome class of a sum of mutant flowers under either play convention via a reduction from \textsc{3-Sat}. Previous work on this topic was done by McKay, Milley, and Nowakowski, and later Lo.

Evil Twins in Sums of Wildflowers

Abstract

A game is said to have the evil twin property if there exists such that and . We study sums of wildflowers, games of form . We find that a large closed set of sums of wildflowers has the evil twin property, extending work of McKay--Milley--Nowakowski and Lo. Our argument partially generalizes the misère genus theory of Conway to partizan games, and requires proving several general theorems on ways to extend sets with the evil twin property. Many sums of mutant flowers of the form , where is a number, also have the evil twin property. We also prove that this set of mutant flowers is the largest such closed set with the evil twin property, and that it is to compute the outcome class of a sum of mutant flowers under either play convention via a reduction from \textsc{3-Sat}. Previous work on this topic was done by McKay, Milley, and Nowakowski, and later Lo.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 26 theorems, 19 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 7 sections, 26 theorems, 19 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.4

Let $F = \sum_{i=1}^m *:a_i$ be a sum of sprigs. Define $F^* = F+*$. Then $o^+(F) = o^-(F^*)$ and $o^-(F^*) =o^+(F)$.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The poset of outcome classes.

Theorems & Definitions (76)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Theorem 1.4
  • Definition 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 1.7
  • proof
  • Theorem 1.8
  • Theorem 1.9
  • ...and 66 more