Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Vector spin glasses with Mattis interaction I: the convex case

Hong-Bin Chen, Victor Issa

Abstract

This paper constitutes the first part of a two-paper series devoted to the systematic study of vector spin glass models whose energy function involves a spin glass part and a general Mattis interaction part. In this paper, we focus on models whose spin glass part satisfies the usual convexity assumption. We identify the limit free energy via a Parisi-type formula and prove a large deviation principle for the mean magnetization. The proof is remarkably simple and short compared to previous approaches; it relies on treating the Mattis interaction as a parameter of the model. In the companion paper, we establish similar results in the high-temperature regime for models whose spin glass part is not assumed to satisfy the usual convexity assumption.

Vector spin glasses with Mattis interaction I: the convex case

Abstract

This paper constitutes the first part of a two-paper series devoted to the systematic study of vector spin glass models whose energy function involves a spin glass part and a general Mattis interaction part. In this paper, we focus on models whose spin glass part satisfies the usual convexity assumption. We identify the limit free energy via a Parisi-type formula and prove a large deviation principle for the mean magnetization. The proof is remarkably simple and short compared to previous approaches; it relies on treating the Mattis interaction as a parameter of the model. In the companion paper, we establish similar results in the high-temperature regime for models whose spin glass part is not assumed to satisfy the usual convexity assumption.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 7 theorems, 55 equations)

This paper contains 9 sections, 7 theorems, 55 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Almost surely over the randomness of $(W_{i,j})_{i,j}$ and $(\chi_i)_i$, we have where the infimum is taken over $m \in \mathbb{R}$ and the supremum over $x \in \mathbb{R}$ and $p : [0,1) \to \mathbb{R}_+$ bounded increasing càdlàg paths. Furthermore, still almost surely over the randomness of $(W_{i,j})_{i,j}$ and $(\chi_i)_i$, the random variable $m_N$ satisfies a large deviat Here $\phi^*(m) =

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Definition 1.3: Large deviation principle
  • Theorem 1.4: LDP for the magnetization
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof : Sketch of proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Remark 2.3
  • Lemma 3.1
  • ...and 5 more