Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Comparison of Motivic Homotopy Theories

Tianjian Tan

Abstract

We construct a comparison functor from the dual category of motivic homotopy category $\mathcal{SH}$ to the category of $\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant localizing motives $\operatorname{Mot}_{\operatorname{loc}}^{\mathbb{A}^1}$ in the sense of Blumberg, Gepner and Tabuada (with $\mathbb{A}^1$-invariance imposed). We as well construct its non-$\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant analogue: a functor from the dual category of Annala-Iwasa-Hoyois's non-$\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant motivic homotopy category $\mathcal{MS}$ to $\operatorname{Mot}_{\operatorname{loc}}$. After the Barr-Beck argument, these functors factor through categories of modules over a dual version of ($\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant) K-theory spectrum $\operatorname{KGL}^{(\mathbb{A}^1)}$. Over a field that admits resolution of singularities, we show that the $\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant factored functor is fully-faithful, while the non-$\mathbb{A}^1$-invariant one is not in general.

Comparison of Motivic Homotopy Theories

Abstract

We construct a comparison functor from the dual category of motivic homotopy category to the category of -invariant localizing motives in the sense of Blumberg, Gepner and Tabuada (with -invariance imposed). We as well construct its non--invariant analogue: a functor from the dual category of Annala-Iwasa-Hoyois's non--invariant motivic homotopy category to . After the Barr-Beck argument, these functors factor through categories of modules over a dual version of (-invariant) K-theory spectrum . Over a field that admits resolution of singularities, we show that the -invariant factored functor is fully-faithful, while the non--invariant one is not in general.
Paper Structure (22 sections, 44 theorems, 127 equations)

This paper contains 22 sections, 44 theorems, 127 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

$\mathcal{SH}^\vee$ (resp. $\mathcal{MS}^\vee$) is equivalent to the category constructed from the spectra-valued presheaf category $\mathcal{P}sh((Sm^{\operatorname{fp}})^{op})$, by first localizing it with respect to certain codescent conditions, and then formally inverting a dual version of $\mat

Theorems & Definitions (80)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • Proposition 1.2: Proposition \ref{['formal.inversion.prop']}
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Proposition 1.4
  • Proposition 1.5: Proposition \ref{['comparison.SH']}
  • Proposition 1.6: Proposition \ref{['countability']}
  • Lemma 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • Definition 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • ...and 70 more