Table of Contents
Fetching ...

From Computational Certification to Exact Coordinates: Heilbronn's Triangle Problem on the Unit Square Using Mixed-Integer Optimization

Nathan Sudermann-Merx

Abstract

We develop an optimize-then-refine framework for the classical Heilbronn triangle problem that integrates global mixed-integer nonlinear programming with exact symbolic computation. A novel symmetry-breaking strategy, together with the exploitation of structural properties of determinants, yields a substantially stronger optimization model: for $n=9$, the problem can be solved to certified global optimality in 15 minutes on a standard desktop computer, improving upon the previously reported effort of about one day by more than an order of magnitude. Combining the numerical certificate with exact symbolic computation, we provide the first proof that the configuration discovered by Comellas and Yebra in 2002 for $n=9$ is globally optimal, and derive exact coordinates for all optimal configurations with $n=5,\dots,9$, confirming earlier best-known results and sometimes simplifying their presentation. An analysis of these configurations reveals structural patterns-notably the clustering of noncritical triangle areas around a small number of distinct values-which give rise to new research questions about the combinatorial geometry of extremal point sets. All configurations and code are publicly available to provide a reproducible foundation for further research.

From Computational Certification to Exact Coordinates: Heilbronn's Triangle Problem on the Unit Square Using Mixed-Integer Optimization

Abstract

We develop an optimize-then-refine framework for the classical Heilbronn triangle problem that integrates global mixed-integer nonlinear programming with exact symbolic computation. A novel symmetry-breaking strategy, together with the exploitation of structural properties of determinants, yields a substantially stronger optimization model: for , the problem can be solved to certified global optimality in 15 minutes on a standard desktop computer, improving upon the previously reported effort of about one day by more than an order of magnitude. Combining the numerical certificate with exact symbolic computation, we provide the first proof that the configuration discovered by Comellas and Yebra in 2002 for is globally optimal, and derive exact coordinates for all optimal configurations with , confirming earlier best-known results and sometimes simplifying their presentation. An analysis of these configurations reveals structural patterns-notably the clustering of noncritical triangle areas around a small number of distinct values-which give rise to new research questions about the combinatorial geometry of extremal point sets. All configurations and code are publicly available to provide a reproducible foundation for further research.
Paper Structure (49 sections, 7 theorems, 27 equations, 14 figures, 13 tables)

This paper contains 49 sections, 7 theorems, 27 equations, 14 figures, 13 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The optimization problem $P_\Delta$ admits a solution for every $n$, and its optimal value $\Delta_n$ is strictly positive.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Best-known values of $\Delta_n$ for the Heilbronn problem in the unit square compared with the asymptotic upper bound $n^{-8/7-1/2000}$ of Cohen, Pohoata, and Zakharov CPZ2023.
  • Figure 1: Coordinates fixed a priori by the symmetry-breaking strategy. The remaining free coordinates are $y_1$, $x_2$, $y_3$, $x_4$, $y_5$, and all coordinates of $p_6,\dots,p_n$, subject to $y_5\ge y_1$, $x_2\le x_4$, and $x_6\le\cdots\le x_n$.
  • Figure 2: Numerical coordinates returned by Gurobi for$~n=7$ (rounded to four decimal places). Five of the seven points lie on the boundary of the unit square.
  • Figure 3: The final mixed-integer formulation $P_\Delta^\star$. Colored boxes indicate the core model $P_\Delta^0$ (blue) and the enhancements: product substitution (teal), sign fixing (orange), symmetry breaking (red), and variable domains (gray).
  • Figure 4: Methodological pipeline of the paper: global computational certification (Step 1), exact analytical refinement (Step 2), yielding exact symbolic optimal points with global numerical optimality certificates.
  • ...and 9 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Remark 1
  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Remark 2
  • Corollary 1
  • Corollary 2
  • Lemma 1: Minimal covering parallelogram
  • proof
  • Proposition 2: Boundary structure
  • proof
  • ...and 13 more