Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Realizing the Emery Model in Optical Lattices for Quantum Simulation of Cuprates and Nickelates

Hannah Lange, Liyang Qiu, Robin Groth, Andreas von Haaren, Luca Muscarella, Titus Franz, Immanuel Bloch, Fabian Grusdt, Philipp M. Preiss, Annabelle Bohrdt

Abstract

The microscopic origin of high-temperature superconductivity in cuprates remains one of the central open questions in condensed matter physics. Growing experimental and theoretical evidence suggests that the bare single-band Fermi-Hubbard model may not fully capture properties of cuprates such as superconductivity, motivating us to revisit the canonical three-band model of the copper-oxide planes - the Emery model - from which the single-band counterpart was originally derived. Here, we propose and analyze a quantum simulation scheme for realizing the Emery model in regimes relevant to cuprates and infinite-layer nickelates with today's ultracold atom quantum simulation platforms, enabling the exploration of the three-band physics on system sizes that are challenging for current numerical methods. Specifically, we show that a two-dimensional optical lattice with a superimposed pattern of repulsive potentials can be designed to study low-temperature properties for variable parameter regimes of the Emery model relevant to cuprates as well as infinite-layer nickelates. Our results pave the way for real material simulations with ultracold atom quantum simulators and a better understanding of the physics of unconventional superconductors.

Realizing the Emery Model in Optical Lattices for Quantum Simulation of Cuprates and Nickelates

Abstract

The microscopic origin of high-temperature superconductivity in cuprates remains one of the central open questions in condensed matter physics. Growing experimental and theoretical evidence suggests that the bare single-band Fermi-Hubbard model may not fully capture properties of cuprates such as superconductivity, motivating us to revisit the canonical three-band model of the copper-oxide planes - the Emery model - from which the single-band counterpart was originally derived. Here, we propose and analyze a quantum simulation scheme for realizing the Emery model in regimes relevant to cuprates and infinite-layer nickelates with today's ultracold atom quantum simulation platforms, enabling the exploration of the three-band physics on system sizes that are challenging for current numerical methods. Specifically, we show that a two-dimensional optical lattice with a superimposed pattern of repulsive potentials can be designed to study low-temperature properties for variable parameter regimes of the Emery model relevant to cuprates as well as infinite-layer nickelates. Our results pave the way for real material simulations with ultracold atom quantum simulators and a better understanding of the physics of unconventional superconductors.
Paper Structure (9 sections, 20 equations, 9 figures)

This paper contains 9 sections, 20 equations, 9 figures.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: The three-band Emery model of cuprates in cold atom quantum simulators: Band structure of cuprates (a) and nickelates (b) with copper $d$ and oxygen $p$ bands. Performing a particle-hole transformation effectively corresponds to reversing the sign of the energy $E_\mathrm{p}\to E_\mathrm{h}$. c) The $d$ and $p_x, p_y$ orbitals also appear in a lattice description of the copper-oxide layers in cuprates, with hopping strengths $t_{pd}$, $t_{pp}^{(\prime)}$. In a description for holes, $p_x, p_y$ orbitals are offset by $\Delta_{pd}>0$. d) Experimental setup: A single laser beam traverses the atomic cloud (gray) sequentially along the $x$ and $y$ axes and is retro-reflected to form a 2D lattice. By inserting a half waveplate (HWP) between the first and second passes, the polarization of the lattice along the $y$-axis can be dynamically tuned from the initial input polarization ($V$, green) to a fully orthogonal state ($H$, orange). As illustrated in the top-right inset, the resulting passively phase-stable lattice features a programmable offset between nearest-neighbor sites. By using a Digital Micromirror Device (DMD) to project repulsive local potentials (violet arrays) through the objective -- blocking out every fourth site -- a dynamically controllable potential for the Emery model is generated (e).
  • Figure 2: Accessible Emery-model parameters in the proposed optical lattice setup: $\Delta/t_{\rm pd}$ (a), $U_p/U_d$ (b), $t_{pp}/t_{pd}$ (c) and $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd}$ (d). The gray masks in the bottom-right corners denote the region that fourth band is too small to support an accurate three-band tight-binding description. The sharp feature appearing in b around $\theta\sim0.05rad$ originate from a change in the band structure where the $d$ and $p$ bands begin to decouple and coincides with the trends of the other parameters note_band. In b, c and d, the two white curves indicate $\Delta_{pd}/t_{pd}=3.5$ relevant to cuprates (solid) and $\Delta_{pd}/t_{pd}=9$ relevant to nickelates (dashed). Panels e and f show band dispersions for $V_0/E_r=15$ at $\theta=0.025rad$ and $\theta=0.049rad$ (marked by the white circle and square in panels c and d), respectively. For panel c (cuprates), $\Delta_{pd}/t_{pd}=3.5$ with $t_{pd}=0.31\,E_r$, $t_{pp}/t_{pd} = 0.03$ and $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd} = -0.2$; for panel d (nickelates), $\Delta_{pd}/t_{pd}=9$ with $t_{pd}=0.24\,E_r$, $t_{pp}/t_{pd} = 0.06$ and $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd} = -0.3$. Dashed lines show the exact dispersions from the experimental lattice potential, while the colored lines show the reconstructed dispersions from the tight-binding Emery model, with color indicating the $d$-orbital character.
  • Figure 3: Numerical results for a cylinder with $12\times 2$ unit cells ($72$ sites) for two sets of parameters relevant to the cuprates ($\Delta/t_{pd}=3.5$) and infinite-layer nickelates ($\Delta/t_{pd}=9.0$) that are accessible for quantum simulation platforms and changing the doping $\delta=N_\mathrm{h}/(L_xL_y)$. a) Average nearest-neighbor spin correlations $C^S_{d\nu}$ divided by average densities $\tilde{n}_\nu$, Eq. \ref{['eq:SS']}, with $\nu=d (p)$ in blue (orange). b) Number of occupied $d$-$p$-$d$ bonds (see sketch). For Zhang-Rice singlets, we expect $N_\mathrm{bond}=N_\mathrm{h}/2$ (gray line), see SM SM. The inset shows the spin correlations $C^\mathrm{bond}_{d\nu}$ (blue and orange) and the total spin $M_\mathrm{bond}$ (green), both post-selected for occupied $d$-$p$-$d$ bonds. For all calculations, we set $U_d/t_{pd}=8.0$, $U_p/t_{pd}=3.0$, $t_{pp}/t_{pd}=0.1$ and $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd}=-0.2$. All observables are evaluated from $2000$ snapshots drawn from the MPS, errorbars denoting the error of the mean are smaller than the markers.
  • Figure S1: a. Copper-oxide layer orbitals with the explicit phases from the copper $d_{x^2-y^2}$ and oxygen $p_{x,y}$ orbitals. b. Copper-oxide layer orbitals after the gauge transformation Eq. \ref{['eq:trafo']}. c. The transformation Eq. \ref{['eq:trafo']} transforms the signs of the $\hat{p}_\mathbf{j}$ operators at every second unit cell, resulting in a redefinition of the quasi-momenta from $\textbf{k}\to \textbf{k}+(\pi,\pi)$.
  • Figure S2: Numerical results for a cylinder with $12\times 2$ unit cells ($72$ sites) for two sets of parameters relevant to the cuprates ($t_{pp}/t_{pd}=0.0(0.5)$, $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd}=0.0$) and the experimentally accessible set ($t_{pp}/t_{pd}=0.1$, $t_{pp}^\prime/t_{pd}=-0.2$), changing the doping $\delta=N_\mathrm{h}/(L_xL_y)$. a. Average nearest-neighbor spin correlations $C^S_{d\nu}$, Eq. \ref{['eq:SS']}, with $\nu=d (p)$ in blue (orange) and divided by the average $\nu$-site density $\tilde{n}_\nu$ (without doublon-hole resolution). b.: Number of occupied $d$-$p$-$d$ bonds (see sketch). For Zhang-Rice singlets, we expect $N_\mathrm{bond}=N_\mathrm{h}/2$ (gray line), see SM SM. The inset shows the spin correlations $C^\mathrm{bond}_{d\nu}$ (blue and orange) and the total spin $M_\mathrm{bond}$ (green), both post-selected for occupied $d$-$p$-$d$ bonds. For all calculations, we set $U_d/t_{pd}=8.0$, $U_p/t_{pd}=3.0$ and $\Delta_{pd}/t_{pd}=3.5$. All observables are evaluated from $2000$ snapshots drawn from the MPS, errorbars denoting the error of the mean are smaller than the markers.
  • ...and 4 more figures