Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New Upper Bounds for the Classical Ramsey Numbers $R(4,4,4)$, $R(3,4,5)$ and $R(3,3,6)$

Luis Boza

Abstract

The inequality \[ R(k_1,\ldots,k_r)\le 2-r+\sum_{i=1}^r R(k_1,\ldots,k_{i-1},k_i-1,k_{i+1},\ldots,k_r) \] is well known, and it is strict whenever the right-hand side and at least one of the terms in the sum are even. Except for two known cases, the best upper bounds for classical Ramsey numbers with at least three colors have so far been obtained from this inequality. In this paper we present new bounds such as $R(4,4,4)\le 229$, $R(3,4,5)\le 157$ and $R(3,3,6)\le 91$.

New Upper Bounds for the Classical Ramsey Numbers $R(4,4,4)$, $R(3,4,5)$ and $R(3,3,6)$

Abstract

The inequality is well known, and it is strict whenever the right-hand side and at least one of the terms in the sum are even. Except for two known cases, the best upper bounds for classical Ramsey numbers with at least three colors have so far been obtained from this inequality. In this paper we present new bounds such as , and .
Paper Structure (2 sections, 7 theorems, 11 equations)

This paper contains 2 sections, 7 theorems, 11 equations.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Main results

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

$R(k_1,\ldots,k_r)\le P(k_1,\ldots,k_r)$. Moreover, the inequality is strict if the right-hand side is even and at least one of the terms in the sum is even.

Theorems & Definitions (13)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Lemma 1.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.4
  • ...and 3 more