Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The complexity of finite smooth words over binary alphabets

Julien Cassaigne, Raphaël Henry

Abstract

Smooth words over an alphabet of non-negative integers $\{a,b\}$ are infinite words that are infinitely derivable, the most famous example being the Oldenburger-Kolakoski word over $\{1,2\}$. The main way to study their language is to consider a finite version of smooth words that we call f-smooth words. In this paper we prove that the f-smooth words are exactly the factors of smooth words, and we make progress towards the conjecture of Sing that the complexity of f-smooth words over $\{a,b\}$ grows like $Θ\left(n^{\log(a+b)/\log((a+b)/2)}\right)$: we prove it over even alphabets, we prove the lower bound over any binary alphabet and we improve the known upper bound over odd alphabets.

The complexity of finite smooth words over binary alphabets

Abstract

Smooth words over an alphabet of non-negative integers are infinite words that are infinitely derivable, the most famous example being the Oldenburger-Kolakoski word over . The main way to study their language is to consider a finite version of smooth words that we call f-smooth words. In this paper we prove that the f-smooth words are exactly the factors of smooth words, and we make progress towards the conjecture of Sing that the complexity of f-smooth words over grows like : we prove it over even alphabets, we prove the lower bound over any binary alphabet and we improve the known upper bound over odd alphabets.
Paper Structure (24 sections, 16 theorems, 53 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 24 sections, 16 theorems, 53 equations, 1 figure.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

CANT If $\mathscr{L}$ is a factorial, left- and right-extendable language, then for all $n \geq 0$ we have

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: The tree $T$ over $\{1,2\}$.

Theorems & Definitions (59)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Definition 1.4
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Definition 1.5
  • Example 1.1
  • Definition 1.6
  • Example 1.2
  • Proposition 1.1
  • ...and 49 more