Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Anti-Ramsey forbidden poset problems

Balázs Patkós

Abstract

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a weak copy of a poset $P$ if there is a bijection $f:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ such that $p\leqslant q$ implies $f(p)\subseteq f(q)$. If $f$ satisfies $p\leqslant q$ if and only if $f(p)\subseteq f(q)$, the $\mathcal{G}$ is a strong copy of $P$. We study the anti-Ramsey numbers $\mathrm{ar}(n,P), \mathrm{ar^*}(n,P)$, the maximum number of colors used in a coloring of $2^{[n]}$ that does not admit a rainbow weak or strong copy of $P$, respectively. We establish connections to the well-studied extremal numbers $\mathrm{La}(n,P)$ and $\mathrm{La^*}(n,P)$ and determine asymptotically $\mathrm{ar^*}(n,T)$ for all tree posets $T$ and $\mathrm{ar^*}(n,O_{2k})$ for all crown posets $O_{2k}$.

Anti-Ramsey forbidden poset problems

Abstract

A family of sets is a weak copy of a poset if there is a bijection such that implies . If satisfies if and only if , the is a strong copy of . We study the anti-Ramsey numbers , the maximum number of colors used in a coloring of that does not admit a rainbow weak or strong copy of , respectively. We establish connections to the well-studied extremal numbers and and determine asymptotically for all tree posets and for all crown posets .
Paper Structure (6 sections, 14 theorems, 14 equations)

This paper contains 6 sections, 14 theorems, 14 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

For any poset $P$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (27)

  • Proposition 1.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.3
  • Theorem 1.5
  • Theorem 1.6
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['tree']} and Theorem \ref{['crown']}
  • ...and 17 more