Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An Approach for Safe and Secure Software Protection Supported by Symbolic Execution

Daniel Dorfmeister, Flavio Ferrarotti, Bernhard Fischer, Evelyn Haslinger, Rudolf Ramler, Markus Zimmermann

TL;DR

A novel copy-protection method for industrial control software that uses symbolic execution to guarantee the preservation of safety properties if the software is executed on a different machine, or if there is a problem with the PUF response.

Abstract

We introduce a novel copy-protection method for industrial control software. With our method, a program executes correctly only on its target hardware and behaves differently on other machines. The hardware-software binding is based on Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs). We use symbolic execution to guarantee the preservation of safety properties if the software is executed on a different machine, or if there is a problem with the PUF response. Moreover, we show that the protection method is also secure against reverse engineering.

An Approach for Safe and Secure Software Protection Supported by Symbolic Execution

TL;DR

A novel copy-protection method for industrial control software that uses symbolic execution to guarantee the preservation of safety properties if the software is executed on a different machine, or if there is a problem with the PUF response.

Abstract

We introduce a novel copy-protection method for industrial control software. With our method, a program executes correctly only on its target hardware and behaves differently on other machines. The hardware-software binding is based on Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs). We use symbolic execution to guarantee the preservation of safety properties if the software is executed on a different machine, or if there is a problem with the PUF response. Moreover, we show that the protection method is also secure against reverse engineering.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 6 equations, 1 figure)

This paper contains 8 sections, 6 equations, 1 figure.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Possible states of one-way stop-go traffic lights