Table of Contents
Fetching ...

VERI-DPO: Evidence-Aware Alignment for Clinical Summarization via Claim Verification and Direct Preference Optimization

Weixin Liu, Congning Ni, Qingyuan Song, Susannah L. Rose, Christopher Symons, Murat Kantarcioglu, Bradley A. Malin, Zhijun Yin

TL;DR

VERI-DPO is introduced, which uses claim verification to mine preferences and distill them into the summarizer with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and verifier-mined preferences separate candidates by contradiction density.

Abstract

Brief Hospital Course (BHC) narratives must be clinically useful yet faithful to fragmented EHR evidence. LLM-based clinical summarizers still introduce unsupported statements, and alignment can encourage omissions ("say-less" degeneration). We introduce VERI-DPO, which uses claim verification to mine preferences and distill them into the summarizer with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). On MIMIC-III-Ext-VeriFact-BHC (100 ICU patients; patient-level splits), we train a retrieval-augmented verifier to label claim-evidence pairs as Supported, Not Supported, or Not Addressed via a single-token format. The verifier scores sentence-level claims from sampled BHC candidates and aggregates margins into a coverage-aware utility to mine length-controlled, contradiction-anchored preference pairs. On held-out patients, verifier-mined preferences separate candidates by contradiction density, and VERI-DPO reduces Not Supported claim rates from 10.7% to 1.9% (local verifier judge) and from 11.6% to 6.4% (GPT-4o judge), while improving validity from 76.7% to 82.5% and maintaining informative length.

VERI-DPO: Evidence-Aware Alignment for Clinical Summarization via Claim Verification and Direct Preference Optimization

TL;DR

VERI-DPO is introduced, which uses claim verification to mine preferences and distill them into the summarizer with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and verifier-mined preferences separate candidates by contradiction density.

Abstract

Brief Hospital Course (BHC) narratives must be clinically useful yet faithful to fragmented EHR evidence. LLM-based clinical summarizers still introduce unsupported statements, and alignment can encourage omissions ("say-less" degeneration). We introduce VERI-DPO, which uses claim verification to mine preferences and distill them into the summarizer with Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). On MIMIC-III-Ext-VeriFact-BHC (100 ICU patients; patient-level splits), we train a retrieval-augmented verifier to label claim-evidence pairs as Supported, Not Supported, or Not Addressed via a single-token format. The verifier scores sentence-level claims from sampled BHC candidates and aggregates margins into a coverage-aware utility to mine length-controlled, contradiction-anchored preference pairs. On held-out patients, verifier-mined preferences separate candidates by contradiction density, and VERI-DPO reduces Not Supported claim rates from 10.7% to 1.9% (local verifier judge) and from 11.6% to 6.4% (GPT-4o judge), while improving validity from 76.7% to 82.5% and maintaining informative length.
Paper Structure (9 equations, 1 figure, 8 tables)

This paper contains 9 equations, 1 figure, 8 tables.

Figures (1)

  • Figure 1: Overview of VERI-DPO. (A) Verifier training: a compact retrieval-augmented verifier predicts single-token labels A/B/C for each (evidence, claim) pair: A=Supported, B=Not Supported (error/hallucination), and C=Not Addressed (omission / not in retrieved evidence). (B) Verifier-driven preference mining: for each sampled BHC candidate, we decompose it into sentence-level claims, retrieve per-claim evidence, and score claims with the verifier; we aggregate claim-level signals into a utility $U(y)$ that penalizes contradictions (NS/HCNS) while discouraging degeneration-by-omission, and select $(y^{+},y^{-})$ under utility and length/coverage constraints (HCNS: B under $\mathrm{bias}_{\mathrm{prec}}$ with margin $\Delta>\delta$). (C) DPO alignment: mined pairs are used to optimize a single-sample policy that internalizes verifier preferences, avoiding inference-time reranking.