Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Gauss-Bonnet scalarization of charged qOS-black holes

Hong Guo, Wontae Kim, Yun Soo Myung

Abstract

The Gauss-Bonnet (GB) scalarization for charged quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder (cqOS)-black holes is investigated in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-scalar theory with the nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) term. Here, the scalar coupling function to GB term is given by $f(φ)=2λφ^2$ with a coupling constant $λ$. Three parameters of mass ($M$), action parameter ($α$), and magnetic charge ($P$) are necessary to describe the cqOS-black hole, and it may become the qOS-black hole when $P=M$. The GB scalarization of cqOS-black holes comes into two cases GB$^\pm$, depending on the sign of GB term which triggers the different phenomena. For $α=0$ and $λ>0$, GB$^+$ scalarization is allowed, while for $α\not=0$ and $λ<0$, GB$^-$ scalarization appears for a narrow band of $3.5653\le α\le 4.6875$. After discussing the onset GB$^-$ scalarization, we construct scalarized qcOS-black holes which belong to the single branch. The scalar field is nonmonotonic near the horizon while it asymptotes to a finite value at infinity, indicating a distinct scalarization mechanism for negative coupling $λ$. Stability analysis shows these scalarized black holes are linearly stable under scalar perturbations.

Gauss-Bonnet scalarization of charged qOS-black holes

Abstract

The Gauss-Bonnet (GB) scalarization for charged quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder (cqOS)-black holes is investigated in the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-scalar theory with the nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) term. Here, the scalar coupling function to GB term is given by with a coupling constant . Three parameters of mass (), action parameter (), and magnetic charge () are necessary to describe the cqOS-black hole, and it may become the qOS-black hole when . The GB scalarization of cqOS-black holes comes into two cases GB, depending on the sign of GB term which triggers the different phenomena. For and , GB scalarization is allowed, while for and , GB scalarization appears for a narrow band of . After discussing the onset GB scalarization, we construct scalarized qcOS-black holes which belong to the single branch. The scalar field is nonmonotonic near the horizon while it asymptotes to a finite value at infinity, indicating a distinct scalarization mechanism for negative coupling . Stability analysis shows these scalarized black holes are linearly stable under scalar perturbations.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 32 equations, 13 figures)

This paper contains 10 sections, 32 equations, 13 figures.

Figures (13)

  • Figure 1: (a) Two outer/inner horizons $r_\pm(M=1,\alpha,P=0.6)$ are functions of $\alpha\in[0,4.6875]$. The bouncing radius $r_{b}(1,\alpha,0.6)$ as function of $\alpha$ is inside the inner horizon. Here, $r_+(1,\alpha,0.6)$ involves the Davies point at [(2.29,1.88), black dot], critical onset point [(3.5653,1.7676), purple dot], and extremal point [(4.6875,1.5), red dot]. (b) Two horizons $r_{\pm}(M,\alpha=1,P=0.6)$ are functions of $M\in[M_{\rm rem}=0.6796,\infty]$, showing the lower mass bound [remnant point at (0.6796,1.02), red dot]. The black dot represents the Davies point at (0.81,1.52), while the purple dot denotes the critical onset point at (0.7277,1.286). The bouncing radius is located inside the inner horizon.
  • Figure 2: Heat capacity $C(M,\alpha,P)/|C_S(1,0,0)|$ with $|C_S(1,0,0)|=25.13$ and temperature $T(M,\alpha,P)/0.04$. (a) Heat capacity $C(M=1,\alpha,P=0.6)$ blows up at Davies point ($\alpha_D=2.29,~\bullet$) and it is zero at the extremal point ($\alpha_e=4.6875,$ red dot). The shaded region represents $C\ge 0$ and it is divided at a line ($\alpha=\alpha_c=3.5653$). (b) Heat capacity $C(M,1,0.6)$ blows up at Davies point ($M_D=0.81,\bullet$). The heat capacity and temperature are zero at the remnant point ($M_{\rm rem}=0.6796,$ red dot). The shaded region denotes $C\ge 0$, but it is divided at a line ($M=M_c=0.7277$).
  • Figure 3: (Left) $\bar{\mathcal{R}}^2_{\rm GB}(r,M=1,\alpha,P=0.6)$ as functions of $r\in [r_+(M=1,\alpha,P=0.6),2.2]$ and $\alpha\in[0,\alpha_e=4.6875]$ and its zero line is available, starting from $\alpha=\alpha_c(=3.5653)$ on the horizon. (Right) $\bar{\mathcal{R}}^2_{\rm GB}(r,M,\alpha=1,P=0.6)$ as functions of $r\in [r_+(M,\alpha=1,P=0.6),1.8]$ and $M\in[M_{\rm rem}=0.6796,0.81]$ and its zero line is available, ending at $M=M_c(=0.7277)$ on the horizon.
  • Figure 4: Three different curves for $nc(M_e,\alpha_e,0.6)=0$, $dc(M_D,\alpha_D,0.6)=0$, and $rc(M_c,\alpha_c,0.6)=0$ for $M\in[0.6796,1.2]$ and $\alpha\in[0,4.6875]$, including extremal/remnant points (red dot), two Davies points (black dot), and two resonance points (purple dot) for $M=1$ and $\alpha=1$.
  • Figure 5: (a) Sufficient condition of $\alpha_{\rm sc}(M=1,\lambda,P=0.6)$ with the critical onset parameter $\alpha=\alpha_c$ as the lower bound. A dashed line denotes the sufficient condition $\alpha=\alpha_{\rm sc}^{-\lambda\gg M,P}$. A top line denotes the extremal point at $\alpha=\alpha_e$ as the upper bound. (b) Graph for $M_{\rm sc}(\alpha=1,\lambda,P=0.6)$ with the critical onset mass $M=M_c$ as the upper bound and the sufficient condition $M=M_{\rm sc}^{-\lambda\gg \alpha,P}$. A bottom line represents the remnant point at $M=M_{\rm rem}$ as the lower bound.
  • ...and 8 more figures