Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Universal Shuffle Asymptotics, Part II: Non-Gaussian Limits for Shuffle Privacy -- Poisson, Skellam, and Compound-Poisson Regimes

Alex Shvets

TL;DR

The present paper characterizes the first universality-breaking frontier: critical sequences of increasingly concentrated local randomizers for which classical Lindeberg conditions fail and the shuffle score exhibits rare macroscopic jumps.

Abstract

Part I of this series (arXiv:2602.09029) develops a sharp Gaussian (LAN/GDP) limit theory for neighboring shuffle experiments when the local randomizer is fixed and has full support bounded away from zero. The present paper characterizes the first universality-breaking frontier: critical sequences of increasingly concentrated local randomizers for which classical Lindeberg conditions fail and the shuffle score exhibits rare macroscopic jumps. For shuffled binary randomized response with local privacy $\varepsilon_0 = \varepsilon_0(n)$, we prove experiment-level convergence (in Le Cam distance) to explicit shift limit experiments: a Poisson-shift limit for the canonical neighboring pair when $\exp(\varepsilon_0(n))/n \to c^2$, and a Skellam-shift limit for proportional compositions $k/n \to π\in (0,1)$ in the same scaling, including an explicit disappearance of the two-sided $δ$-floor away from boundary compositions. For general finite alphabets, we introduce a sparse-error critical regime and prove a multivariate compound-Poisson / independent Poisson vector limit for the centered released histogram, yielding a multivariate Poisson-shift experiment and an explicit limiting $(\varepsilon, δ)$ curve as a multivariate Poisson series. Together with Part I, these results yield a three-regime picture (Gaussian/GDP, critical Poisson/Skellam/compound-Poisson, and super-critical no privacy) under convergent macroscopic scalings.

Universal Shuffle Asymptotics, Part II: Non-Gaussian Limits for Shuffle Privacy -- Poisson, Skellam, and Compound-Poisson Regimes

TL;DR

The present paper characterizes the first universality-breaking frontier: critical sequences of increasingly concentrated local randomizers for which classical Lindeberg conditions fail and the shuffle score exhibits rare macroscopic jumps.

Abstract

Part I of this series (arXiv:2602.09029) develops a sharp Gaussian (LAN/GDP) limit theory for neighboring shuffle experiments when the local randomizer is fixed and has full support bounded away from zero. The present paper characterizes the first universality-breaking frontier: critical sequences of increasingly concentrated local randomizers for which classical Lindeberg conditions fail and the shuffle score exhibits rare macroscopic jumps. For shuffled binary randomized response with local privacy , we prove experiment-level convergence (in Le Cam distance) to explicit shift limit experiments: a Poisson-shift limit for the canonical neighboring pair when , and a Skellam-shift limit for proportional compositions in the same scaling, including an explicit disappearance of the two-sided -floor away from boundary compositions. For general finite alphabets, we introduce a sparse-error critical regime and prove a multivariate compound-Poisson / independent Poisson vector limit for the centered released histogram, yielding a multivariate Poisson-shift experiment and an explicit limiting curve as a multivariate Poisson series. Together with Part I, these results yield a three-regime picture (Gaussian/GDP, critical Poisson/Skellam/compound-Poisson, and super-critical no privacy) under convergent macroscopic scalings.
Paper Structure (27 sections, 33 theorems, 298 equations)

This paper contains 27 sections, 33 theorems, 298 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Assume $Q \ll P$ and let $L = dQ/dP$. Then for every $\varepsilon \geq 0$, If the sample space is countable with pmfs $p$ and $q$, then for every $\varepsilon \geq 0$, The first identity requires $Q \ll P$; the second does not.

Theorems & Definitions (81)

  • Lemma 2.1: Neyman--Pearson identities for the privacy curve
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2: Coupling bound for total variation
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3: Contraction of total variation under measurable maps
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4: Tensorization / union bound for independent pairs
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.5: Le Cam distance bounded by total variation on the same space
  • proof
  • ...and 71 more