Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Mitigating Mixed-field Interference in Near-field and Far-field Communications: An Antenna Selection Approach

Tianyu Liu, Changsheng You, Chao Zhou, Mingjiang Wu, Ming-Min Zhao, Zhaocheng Wang

TL;DR

An antenna selection-based transmission framework to effectively suppress mixed-field interference without mechanically altering antenna structures is proposed and analytically shows that the strong mixed-field interference can be substantially mitigated by deactivating only a small portion of antennas, yet without compromising array gains too much.

Abstract

In mixed near-field and far-field systems, the nonorthogonality between near-field and far-field channels may cause severe inter-user interference and hence degrade rate performance, when the analog beamforming is designed based on the low-complexity full-array maximum ratio transmission (MRT). To tackle this issue, we propose in this paper an antenna selection-based transmission framework to effectively suppress mixed-field interference without mechanically altering antenna structures. To this end, an optimization problem is formulated to maximize the sum-rate of mixed-field systems, by jointly designing antenna selection and power allocation under the MRT-based analog beamforming. As the problem is non-convex and generally difficult to solve optimally, we first consider a typical two-user scenario to obtain useful insights. Interestingly, we analytically show that the strong mixed-field interference can be substantially mitigated by deactivating only a small portion of antennas, yet without compromising array gains too much. Moreover, an inherent tradeoff is revealed in antenna selection between interference suppression and array-gain enhancement, based on which a suboptimal number of deactivated antennas for achieving the maximum sum-rate is obtained. Next, for the general multi-user case, we develop an efficient penalty dual decomposition (PDD)-based two-layer framework to obtain its high quality solution by using the block coordinate descent (BCD) and successive convex approximation (SCA) techniques. To further reduce the computational complexity, a low-complexity antenna deactivation strategy is proposed capitalizing on an interference suppression criterion. Last, numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves a favorable trade-off between interference suppression and array gain loss, hence achieving significant performance gains over various baseline schemes.

Mitigating Mixed-field Interference in Near-field and Far-field Communications: An Antenna Selection Approach

TL;DR

An antenna selection-based transmission framework to effectively suppress mixed-field interference without mechanically altering antenna structures is proposed and analytically shows that the strong mixed-field interference can be substantially mitigated by deactivating only a small portion of antennas, yet without compromising array gains too much.

Abstract

In mixed near-field and far-field systems, the nonorthogonality between near-field and far-field channels may cause severe inter-user interference and hence degrade rate performance, when the analog beamforming is designed based on the low-complexity full-array maximum ratio transmission (MRT). To tackle this issue, we propose in this paper an antenna selection-based transmission framework to effectively suppress mixed-field interference without mechanically altering antenna structures. To this end, an optimization problem is formulated to maximize the sum-rate of mixed-field systems, by jointly designing antenna selection and power allocation under the MRT-based analog beamforming. As the problem is non-convex and generally difficult to solve optimally, we first consider a typical two-user scenario to obtain useful insights. Interestingly, we analytically show that the strong mixed-field interference can be substantially mitigated by deactivating only a small portion of antennas, yet without compromising array gains too much. Moreover, an inherent tradeoff is revealed in antenna selection between interference suppression and array-gain enhancement, based on which a suboptimal number of deactivated antennas for achieving the maximum sum-rate is obtained. Next, for the general multi-user case, we develop an efficient penalty dual decomposition (PDD)-based two-layer framework to obtain its high quality solution by using the block coordinate descent (BCD) and successive convex approximation (SCA) techniques. To further reduce the computational complexity, a low-complexity antenna deactivation strategy is proposed capitalizing on an interference suppression criterion. Last, numerical results demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves a favorable trade-off between interference suppression and array gain loss, hence achieving significant performance gains over various baseline schemes.
Paper Structure (29 sections, 5 theorems, 54 equations, 12 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 29 sections, 5 theorems, 54 equations, 12 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Supposing that $\ell$ antennas have been deactivated and $\ell \ll N$, the reduction of interference coupling factor during the $(\ell+1)$-th deactivation can be approximated as where $\theta_{\Delta}^{(\ell+1)} = \angle s^{(\ell)} - \angle c_{ n^{(\ell+1)}}$.

Figures (12)

  • Figure 1: Different beamforming architectures for the considered mixed-field communication system.
  • Figure 2: Mixed-field channel correlation and achievable sum-rate vs. angular difference in the two-user case.
  • Figure 3: Interference coupling factor vs. number of deactivated antennas.
  • Figure 4: Illustration of the performance obtained by the proposed antenna deactivation scheme with optimized power allocation.
  • Figure 5: Total interference during greedy deactivation in a five-user system: 2 near-field users at $(-0.30, 5.82\,\text{m})$ and $(0.17, 6.21\,\text{m})$, and 3 far-field users at $(-0.22, 150\,\text{m})$, $(0.09, 175\,\text{m})$, and $(0.25, 200\,\text{m})$.
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Definition 1
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Lemma 5