Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Interband pairing in two-band superconductors with spin-orbit and Zeeman couplings

Shohei O. Shingu, Jun Goryo

Abstract

Interband pairing in multiband superconductors is often neglected because of its higher energetic cost compared with intraband pairing. We show that, in multiband systems, a Zeeman magnetic field can stabilize interband pairing through the near degeneracy of spin-split branches from different bands, even within a minimal on-site attractive interaction. Using hexagonal tight-binding models with locally broken inversion symmetry, we find a Zeeman-driven transition between a conventional intraband s-wave state and an interband-dominated superconducting Mixing state. The resulting quasiparticle spectrum is intrinsically gapless, leading to anomalous thermodynamic behavior, including a T-linear specific heat at low temperatures, reflecting a finite zero-energy density of states.

Interband pairing in two-band superconductors with spin-orbit and Zeeman couplings

Abstract

Interband pairing in multiband superconductors is often neglected because of its higher energetic cost compared with intraband pairing. We show that, in multiband systems, a Zeeman magnetic field can stabilize interband pairing through the near degeneracy of spin-split branches from different bands, even within a minimal on-site attractive interaction. Using hexagonal tight-binding models with locally broken inversion symmetry, we find a Zeeman-driven transition between a conventional intraband s-wave state and an interband-dominated superconducting Mixing state. The resulting quasiparticle spectrum is intrinsically gapless, leading to anomalous thermodynamic behavior, including a T-linear specific heat at low temperatures, reflecting a finite zero-energy density of states.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 17 equations, 8 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 7 sections, 17 equations, 8 figures, 1 table.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Figure showing (a) the honeycomb lattice and (b) the example of Fermi surfaces without the SOC and the external magnetic field.
  • Figure 2: Figure showing lattice and Fermi surfaces. (a) Non-symmorphic two-layer hexagonal model similar to SrPtAs ( space group $D^{4}_{6 h}$ or ${\it P} 6_{3} / mmc$ ). (b) The example of Fermi surfaces without the SOC and the external magnetic field. There is a band degeneracy at $k_{z} = \pi / c$.
  • Figure 3: The Fermi surfaces. (a) 2DFS1 with $h / t = 0.0$, $h / t = 0.11$. (b) 2DFS2 with $h / t = 0.0$, $h / t = 0.14$. (c) 3DFS1 with $h / t = 0.0$, $h / t = 0.115$. (d) 3DFS2 with $h / t = 0.0$, $h / t = 0.125$. The external magnetic field $h$ reduces the energy mismatch at the Fermi level between the down-spin branch of band $\xi_{\bm k 1}$ and the up-spin branch of band $\xi_{\bm k2}$.
  • Figure 4: (a) Transition temperature $T_c$ as a function of the SOC strength $\alpha$ for the 2D model at $h=0$. The red (blue) curves correspond to the tight-binding parameters of 2DFS1 (2DFS2) listed in Table \ref{['ferpara']}, with all parameters fixed except for $\alpha$. (b) Corresponding results for the 3D models. The red (blue) curves represent the parameter sets 3DFS1 (3DFS2) in Table \ref{['ferpara']}, again varying only $\alpha$. In both dimensions, the transition temperature of the $s$-wave state is higher than that of the Mixing state.
  • Figure 5: (a) Transition temperature $T_c$ as a function of the hopping parameter $t_c$ for the 2D model at $h=\alpha=0$. The red (blue) curves correspond to the parameter sets 2DFS1 (2DFS2) listed in Table \ref{['ferpara']}, with all parameters fixed to those values except that $\alpha$ is set to zero and $t_c$ is varied. (b) Corresponding results for the 3D models. The red (blue) curves represent the parameter sets 3DFS1 (3DFS2) in Table \ref{['ferpara']}, again with $\alpha=0$ and varying only $t_c$. For $\alpha=0$, the Mixing state reduces to purely interband pairing. In both dimensions, the transition temperature of the $s$-wave state is higher than that of the Mixing state.
  • ...and 3 more figures