Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unconditional structure of Banach spaces with few operators

Fernando Albiac, Jose L. Ansorena

Abstract

This article was initially motivated by our goal to show that the Banach space $\mathbb{G}$ constructed by Gowers in [W. T. Gowers, A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem, Bull. London Math. Soc. 26 (1994), no. 6, 523-530] to settle Banach's hyperplane problem has a unique unconditional basis. This uniqueness result served as a springboard to ask whether further structural insights could be derived by rigging Gowers' original construction. As it turned out, the $p$-convexification of $\mathbb{G}$ for $1< p<\infty$, $p\not=2$, provides a family of Banach spaces, each of them with a unique unconditional basis containing block bases whose spreading models are not equivalent to the unit vector basis of $\ell_1$, $\ell_2$, or $c_0$. This solves in the negative a forty-year-old open problem raised by Bourgain et al. in their 1985 \textit{Memoir}, [J. Bourgain, P. G. Casazza, J. Lindenstrauss, and L. Tzafriri, Banach spaces with a unique unconditional basis, up to permutation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1985), no. 322, iv+111] where they studied the uniqueness of unconditional structure in infinite direct sums of those three spaces with the aim to classify all Banach spaces with a unique unconditional basis. As a by-product of our work, we also disprove the conjecture in structure theory that a space having a unique unconditional basis must be isomorphic to its square, and evince that when a Banach space $\mathbb{X}$ with an unconditional basis has few operators, then the space itself and all its complemented subspaces have a unique unconditional structure.

Unconditional structure of Banach spaces with few operators

Abstract

This article was initially motivated by our goal to show that the Banach space constructed by Gowers in [W. T. Gowers, A solution to Banach's hyperplane problem, Bull. London Math. Soc. 26 (1994), no. 6, 523-530] to settle Banach's hyperplane problem has a unique unconditional basis. This uniqueness result served as a springboard to ask whether further structural insights could be derived by rigging Gowers' original construction. As it turned out, the -convexification of for , , provides a family of Banach spaces, each of them with a unique unconditional basis containing block bases whose spreading models are not equivalent to the unit vector basis of , , or . This solves in the negative a forty-year-old open problem raised by Bourgain et al. in their 1985 \textit{Memoir}, [J. Bourgain, P. G. Casazza, J. Lindenstrauss, and L. Tzafriri, Banach spaces with a unique unconditional basis, up to permutation, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 54 (1985), no. 322, iv+111] where they studied the uniqueness of unconditional structure in infinite direct sums of those three spaces with the aim to classify all Banach spaces with a unique unconditional basis. As a by-product of our work, we also disprove the conjecture in structure theory that a space having a unique unconditional basis must be isomorphic to its square, and evince that when a Banach space with an unconditional basis has few operators, then the space itself and all its complemented subspaces have a unique unconditional structure.
Paper Structure (10 sections, 32 theorems, 109 equations)

This paper contains 10 sections, 32 theorems, 109 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.1

Let $\mathbb{X}$ be a Banach space with a semi-normalized unconditional basis $\mathcal{X}$. Suppose that $\mathcal{X}^2 \sim \mathcal{X}$ and that for all semi-normalized unconditional bases $\mathcal{Y}$ and $\mathcal{U}$ of Banach spaces $\mathbb{Y}$ and $\mathbb{U}$, respectively, such that $\ma

Theorems & Definitions (60)

  • Lemma 2.1: see AlbiacAnsorena2025
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof : Proof of Lemmas \ref{['lem:KrivineA']} and \ref{['lem:KrivineB']}
  • Theorem 2.6
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.9
  • Lemma 2.10
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.11
  • ...and 50 more