Table of Contents
Fetching ...

From debt crises to financial crashes (and back): a stock-flow consistent model for stock price bubbles

Matheus R. Grasselli, Adrien Nguyen-Huu

Abstract

We develop a stochastic macro-financial model in continuous time by integrating two specifications of the Keen economic framework with a financial market driven by a jump-diffusion process. The economic block of the model combines monetary debt-deflation mechanisms with Ponzi-type financial destabilization and is influenced by the financial market through a stochastic interest rate that depends on asset price returns. The financial market block of the model consists of an asset with jump--diffusion price process with endogenous, state-dependent jump intensities driven by speculative credit flows. The model formalizes a feedback loop linking credit expansion, crash risk, perceived return dynamics, and bank lending spreads. Under suitable parameter restrictions, we establish global existence and non-explosion of the coupled system. Numerical experiments illustrate how variations in credit sensitivity and jump parameters generate regimes ranging from stable growth to recurrent boom--bust cycles. The framework provides a tractable setting for analyzing endogenous financial fragility within a mathematically well-posed macro--financial system.

From debt crises to financial crashes (and back): a stock-flow consistent model for stock price bubbles

Abstract

We develop a stochastic macro-financial model in continuous time by integrating two specifications of the Keen economic framework with a financial market driven by a jump-diffusion process. The economic block of the model combines monetary debt-deflation mechanisms with Ponzi-type financial destabilization and is influenced by the financial market through a stochastic interest rate that depends on asset price returns. The financial market block of the model consists of an asset with jump--diffusion price process with endogenous, state-dependent jump intensities driven by speculative credit flows. The model formalizes a feedback loop linking credit expansion, crash risk, perceived return dynamics, and bank lending spreads. Under suitable parameter restrictions, we establish global existence and non-explosion of the coupled system. Numerical experiments illustrate how variations in credit sensitivity and jump parameters generate regimes ranging from stable growth to recurrent boom--bust cycles. The framework provides a tractable setting for analyzing endogenous financial fragility within a mathematically well-posed macro--financial system.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 4 theorems, 101 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables)

This paper contains 21 sections, 4 theorems, 101 equations, 8 figures, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition A.1

Let $r=(r_t)_{t\ge 0}$ be a bounded function of time such that Let $(\omega_0,e_0,m_{f,0},\ell_0)\in (0,+\infty)\times(0,+\infty)\times\mathbb{R}^2$. Let $\pi$ be given by eq:profit share, namely Let $g(\pi)$ be defined by eq:growth, and let $f_t=\Psi(g(\pi_t)+i(\omega_t))$ with $\Psi$ defined in eq:Psi. Assume that $\Phi$ is affine as in eq:philips, and that $i(\omega)$ is given by inflation. T

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Wage share $\omega$ and employment rate $e$ (top row), net financial charges $\bar{r}_L \ell -\bar{r}_M m$ and speculative flow $f$ (middle row), and discounted stock price $\tilde{S}$, trend indicator $\mu$ and effective rate $r$ (bottom row) in the deterministic case with $\bar{\rho}_1 = \bar{\lambda}^{\pm}=0$. A low interest rate $\bar{r}_L=0.02$ (left) leads to the interior equilibrium for economic variables and $\bar{\mu}_0 = 0.025$ for the long-term mean of the trend indicator. A higher interest rate $\bar{r}_L=0.15$ (right) leads to a collapse of the real economy and a higher value $\bar{\mu}_0 = 0.145$ for the long-term mean of the trend indicator. In both cases the stock price follows a geometric Browning motion.
  • Figure 2: Wage share $\omega$ and employment rate $e$ (top row), net financial charges $\bar{r}_L \ell -\bar{r}_M m$ and speculative flow $f$ (middle row), and discounted stock price $\tilde{S}$, trend indicator $\mu$ and effective rate $r$ (bottom row) in the case with nonzero jump intensities $\bar{\lambda}^\pm = 1$ but $\rho_1 = 0$. A low interest rate $r_L=0.02$ (left) still leads to the interior equilibrium for economics variables, but stock price now has downward jumps of relative size $\bar{J}^+ = 0.1$ occurring on average once every $(\bar{\lambda}^+\bar{f})^{-1}\approx 17.67$ years, and $\bar{\mu}^+ \approx 0.02469 < \bar{\mu}_0$. A high interest rate $r_L=0.15$ still leads to a collapse of the economy, with the stock price exhibiting upward jumps of relative size $\bar{J}^- = 0.1$ occurring on average once every $(\bar{\lambda}^-\bar{f})^{-1}\approx 6.67$ years, and $\bar{\mu}^- \approx 0.1435 < \bar{\mu}_0$. (right)
  • Figure 3: Wage share $\omega$ and employment rate $e$ (top row), net financial charges $\bar{r}_L \ell -\bar{r}_M m$ and speculative flow $f$ (middle row), and discounted stock price $\tilde{S}$, trend indicator $\mu$ and effective rate $r$ (bottom row) in the case with $\bar{\lambda}^\pm = 0$ and $\rho_1 = 0.01$. A low baseline interest rate $r_L=0.02$ (left) can now be associate with a collapse in the economy because of the influence of the stock price on the effective rate $r$, even in the absence of jumps. The higher baseline interest rate $r_L=0.15$ (right) simply makes this collapse occur sooner.
  • Figure 4: Wage share $\omega$ and employment rate $e$ (top row), net financial charges $\bar{r}_L \ell -\bar{r}_M m$ and speculative flow $f$ (middle row), and discounted stock price $\tilde{S}$, trend indicator $\mu$ and effective rate $r$ (bottom row) for baseline case with all parameters as in Table \ref{['table']} (left) and case with higher stock price volatility $\bar{\sigma} = 0.25$ (right).
  • Figure 5: Wage share $\omega$ and employment rate $e$ (top row), net financial charges $\bar{r}_L \ell -\bar{r}_M m$ and speculative flow $f$ (middle row), and discounted stock price $\tilde{S}$, trend indicator $\mu$ and effective rate $r$ (bottom row) for the cases with $\bar{\eta}_\mu = 5$ (left) and $\bar{\eta}_\mu = 0.2$.
  • ...and 3 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (8)

  • Proposition A.1
  • proof
  • Proposition A.2
  • proof
  • Proposition A.3
  • proof
  • Corollary A.1
  • proof