Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Entanglement distribution: To herald or not to herald

Jeffrey H. Shapiro, Clark Embleton, J. Gabriel Richardson

Abstract

High-rate, high-fidelity entanglement distribution is essential for the creation of a quantum internet, and spontaneous parametric downconverters (SPDCs) are, at present, the preferred sources of entangled signal-idler photon pairs for transmission to Alice and Bob's quantum nodes. SPDCs using phase-matched spectral islands are especially attractive, in this regard, because they provide wavelength-division multiplexed signal-idler pairs with single-mode temporal behavior. This paper compares the entanglement distribution rates of three islands-based systems. Two use idler detections for heralding: islands-based zero-added-loss multiplexing (ZALM), and an islands-based Sagnac SPDC source with signal-path erasure. The third employs an unheralded Sagnac SPDC source. For 90% or lower heralding efficiencies, ZALM's per-pump-pulse entanglement distribution rate exceeds that of the signal-path erasure source, and both rates are inferior to unheralded operation's when all three systems employ $N_I$ spectral islands and allocate $N_M = N_I$ quantum memories to each pump pulse. These behaviors, however, must be weighed against the three systems' differing equipment requirements, e.g., ZALM requires a pair of perfectly-matched Sagnac sources, which is a significant burden not incurred by the signal-path erasure approach, and both heralded systems will suffer, in comparison with unheralded operation, if they cannot realize high heralding efficiencies.

Entanglement distribution: To herald or not to herald

Abstract

High-rate, high-fidelity entanglement distribution is essential for the creation of a quantum internet, and spontaneous parametric downconverters (SPDCs) are, at present, the preferred sources of entangled signal-idler photon pairs for transmission to Alice and Bob's quantum nodes. SPDCs using phase-matched spectral islands are especially attractive, in this regard, because they provide wavelength-division multiplexed signal-idler pairs with single-mode temporal behavior. This paper compares the entanglement distribution rates of three islands-based systems. Two use idler detections for heralding: islands-based zero-added-loss multiplexing (ZALM), and an islands-based Sagnac SPDC source with signal-path erasure. The third employs an unheralded Sagnac SPDC source. For 90% or lower heralding efficiencies, ZALM's per-pump-pulse entanglement distribution rate exceeds that of the signal-path erasure source, and both rates are inferior to unheralded operation's when all three systems employ spectral islands and allocate quantum memories to each pump pulse. These behaviors, however, must be weighed against the three systems' differing equipment requirements, e.g., ZALM requires a pair of perfectly-matched Sagnac sources, which is a significant burden not incurred by the signal-path erasure approach, and both heralded systems will suffer, in comparison with unheralded operation, if they cannot realize high heralding efficiencies.
Paper Structure (19 sections, 112 equations, 20 figures, 4 tables)

This paper contains 19 sections, 112 equations, 20 figures, 4 tables.

Figures (20)

  • Figure 1: Schematic of a Sagnac-configured SPDC source Wong2006 of signal-idler biphotons suitable for use with $N_I\ge 1$ in islands-based heralded operation using either the dual-Sagnac source or the Chahine et al. source. A periodically-poled lithium niobate (PPLN) crystal with $N_I$ phase-matched spectral islands footnote4 is bidirectionally pulse-pumped for type-0 nondegenerate phase matching. $D$, $H$, and $V$: diagonal, horizontal, and vertical polarizations. HR: high reflector. $\lambda$: wavelength. PBS: polarizing beam splitter. HWP: half-wave plate.
  • Figure 2: Sketch of the frequency-domain wave function for a biphoton produced by 6 identical, spectrally-factorable phase-matched spectral islands, with signal-idler center frequencies $\{(\omega_{S_n},\omega_{I_n}): n=1,2,\ldots,6\}$.
  • Figure 3: Schematic of islands-based ZALM's partial Bell-state measurement for heralding polarization-entangled photon pairs. Here $S_k$ and $I_k$ for $k = 1,2$ denote the signal ($S$) and idler ($I$) beams from the $k$th Sagnac source. $I_\pm$ denote the idler-beam outputs from the 50--50 beam splitter (BS); $I_{\pm P}$ for $P= H, V$ denote the horizontally ($H$) and vertically ($V$) polarized outputs from the polarizing beam splitter (PBS) illuminated by $I_\pm$; DWDM$_I$: idler-beam dense wavelength-division multiplexing filter. SPD: single-photon detector.
  • Figure 4: Schematic of Chahine et al.'s islands-based source of heralded polarization-entangled photon pairs. $S^\perp_P$ for $P = V,H$ are auxiliary vacuum-state $P$-polarized modes needed to ensure that the $S_k = S_{k_H}S_{k_V}$ modes for $k=1,2$ have proper free-field commutators. DWDM$_I$: idler-beam dense wavelength-division multiplexing filter. SPD: single-photon detector. BS: 50--50 beam splitter.
  • Figure 5: Schematic of islands-based source for unheralded distribution of polarization-entangled photon pairs. A periodically-poled lithium niobate (PPLN) crystal with $N_M$ phase-matched spectral islands footnote5 is bidirectionally pulse-pumped for type-0 nondegenerate phase matching. $D$, $H$, and $V$: diagonal, horizontal, and vertical polarizations. HR: high reflector. $\lambda$: wavelength. PBS: polarizing beam splitter. HWP: half-wave plate.
  • ...and 15 more figures