Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New results for Heisenberg dynamics for non self-adjoint Hamiltonians

Fabio Bagarello

Abstract

In a previous paper we began our analysis on the role of non self-adjoint Hamiltonians in connection with the Heisenberg dynamics for quantum systems. Here, motivated by the growing interest on this topic and on some recent results on dynamical systems, we continue this analysis focusing on what we believe is an unexplored (or, at least, not so explored! aspect of Heisenberg dynamics, related to the need for using vectors which are {\em brute-force normalized}. Our main interest is on conserved quantities, and on conditions which guarantee that some observables of the system, or their mean values, do not evolve in time.

New results for Heisenberg dynamics for non self-adjoint Hamiltonians

Abstract

In a previous paper we began our analysis on the role of non self-adjoint Hamiltonians in connection with the Heisenberg dynamics for quantum systems. Here, motivated by the growing interest on this topic and on some recent results on dynamical systems, we continue this analysis focusing on what we believe is an unexplored (or, at least, not so explored! aspect of Heisenberg dynamics, related to the need for using vectors which are {\em brute-force normalized}. Our main interest is on conserved quantities, and on conditions which guarantee that some observables of the system, or their mean values, do not evolve in time.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 4 theorems, 51 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 theorems, 51 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

The following statements are equivalent: 1) $\delta_\gamma$ is a *-derivation; 2) $\delta_\gamma(1 \!\! 1)=0$; 3) $H=H^\dagger$; 4) $\gamma^t(1 \!\! 1)=1 \!\! 1$; 5) $\gamma^t(XY)=\gamma^t(X)\gamma^t(Y)$, $\forall X,Y\in{\mathfrak B}(\mathcal{H})$.

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Definition 3
  • Lemma 4
  • Proposition 5