Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Chiral and pair superfluidity in triangular ladder produced by state-dependent Kronig-Penney lattice

Domantas Burba, Giedrius Žlabys, Dzmitry Viarbitski, Thomas Busch, Gediminas Juzeliūnas

Abstract

We propose a concrete realization of a triangular ladder for ultracold atoms, which simultaneously hosts geometric frustration and unusual two-body interactions, and in particular controllable pair hopping and density-induced tunneling. This is done by means of a spin-dependent Kronig-Penney lattice created using a spatially-dependent tripod-type atom-light coupling. We apply density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations to derive the quantum phase diagram. We find that pair tunneling stabilizes a robust pair superfluid, characterized by power-law decay of pair correlations. Additionally, a chiral superfluid arises from frustration induced by competing nearest neighbor (NN) and next-nearest neighbor (NNN) tunnelings. Finally, in the high barrier regime, we map our system onto the XXZ spin model and find the exact phase transition points.

Chiral and pair superfluidity in triangular ladder produced by state-dependent Kronig-Penney lattice

Abstract

We propose a concrete realization of a triangular ladder for ultracold atoms, which simultaneously hosts geometric frustration and unusual two-body interactions, and in particular controllable pair hopping and density-induced tunneling. This is done by means of a spin-dependent Kronig-Penney lattice created using a spatially-dependent tripod-type atom-light coupling. We apply density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations to derive the quantum phase diagram. We find that pair tunneling stabilizes a robust pair superfluid, characterized by power-law decay of pair correlations. Additionally, a chiral superfluid arises from frustration induced by competing nearest neighbor (NN) and next-nearest neighbor (NNN) tunnelings. Finally, in the high barrier regime, we map our system onto the XXZ spin model and find the exact phase transition points.
Paper Structure (15 sections, 49 equations, 6 figures, 1 table)

This paper contains 15 sections, 49 equations, 6 figures, 1 table.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: (a) Tripod atom-light coupling configuration for ultracold atoms. (b) Spatial dependence of the modulus of the Rabi frequencies $\Omega_{l}$ ($l\in \left\{1,2,3\right\}$) obtained from Eq. \ref{['eq:Tripod-Omegas']} for $\epsilon=0.1$.
  • Figure 2: (a) The geometric scalar potential $\phi\approx\hbar^2\theta^{\prime 2}/2m$EdvinasScipost in the units of the recoil energy $E_{\mathrm{R}}=\hbar^2k^2/2m$ for $\epsilon=\Omega_\mathrm{p}/\Omega_\mathrm{c}=0.1$. The potential represents a periodic array of barriers that act in the alternating manner on the symmetric (green) or antisymmetric (yellow) superposition of atomic ground states $|\pm\rangle$. (b) Schematic representation of the corresponding Wannier functions of the lowest (the $s$) Bloch band for atoms in the symmetric (green) or antisymmetric (yellow) superposition states $|\pm\rangle$.
  • Figure 3: (a) Triangular ladder with opposite-sign single-particle hoppings $J_1$ and $J_2$, yielding effective geometric frustration. Consequently, each triangular plaquette has a $\pi$-flux. (b) The corresponding linearized 1D chain described by Hamiltonian of Eq. \ref{['eq:WannierBasis']} containing the NN and NNN couplings $J_1$ and $J_2$.
  • Figure 4: (a) Ground state phase diagram for the Hamiltonian given by Eqs. \ref{['eq:HMain']}-\ref{['eq:HIntMain']} with $D=0$ (i.e., $g_z=0$), showing the dependence of the phases on parameter ratios $g_x/g_0$ and $J_1/g_0G_{000}$. Solid lines indicate sharp phase transitions, while dotted line specifies a BKT transition. Yellow markers for $J_1=0$ (corresponding to the horizontal $g_x/g_0$ axis) indicate exact transition points determined by the spin mapping, explained in Sec. \ref{['sec:spin-mapping']}. The $g_x$ dependence of: (b) even parity order parameter $O_{\rm even}\left(\Delta j\right)$, defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:even-parity']}; (c) chirality-chirality correlation $\kappa_2 \left(\Delta j\right)$, defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:chirality-chirality-corr']}; (d) the structure factor $S\left(k\right)$ at $k=\pi$, defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:struct-fact']}; (e) pair correlation function $C_2\left(\Delta j\right)$, defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:C2-corr']}; for $J_1/g_0G_{000}=0.075$ and $\Delta j = 159$. Note that $C_1\left(\Delta j\right)$ is non-zero for long ranges in the CSF region, but it is not shown for simplicity.
  • Figure 5: Energies per site $e$ vs. the interaction strength ratio $g_{x}/g_{0}$. The Mott insulator energy per site $e_{{\rm MI}}$ is represented by a solid blue line, while AFM energy per site $e_{{\rm AFM}}$ is represented by a dashed red line.
  • ...and 1 more figures