Table of Contents
Fetching ...

$e^+e^- \rightarrow s\bar{s}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 250$ GeV at future linear colliders

J. P. Márquez, R. Pöeschl, A. Irles, F. Richard

Abstract

The forward--backward asymmetry ($A_{FB}$) in light-quark production is a sensitive probe of the electroweak sector and potential flavour-dependent BSM effects. We present a study of $e^+e^- \rightarrow s\bar{s}$ at $\sqrt{s}=250$ GeV at future linear colliders, using full ILD simulation and reconstruction tools for ILC and LCF@CERN. We assess the impact of particle identification on charge reconstruction and $A_{FB}$ extraction, considering software improvements using Comprehensive PID (CPID) for optimal $dE/dx$ usage, as well as hardware scenarios including cluster counting ($dN/dx$) and ideal TPC performance. Statistical precision gains are evaluated, with corrections for charge misidentification and acceptance applied. Results indicate that precise $A_{FB}^{s\bar{s}}$ measurements are feasible and that advanced PID is key to maximising sensitivity to electroweak and new-physics effects.

$e^+e^- \rightarrow s\bar{s}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 250$ GeV at future linear colliders

Abstract

The forward--backward asymmetry () in light-quark production is a sensitive probe of the electroweak sector and potential flavour-dependent BSM effects. We present a study of at GeV at future linear colliders, using full ILD simulation and reconstruction tools for ILC and LCF@CERN. We assess the impact of particle identification on charge reconstruction and extraction, considering software improvements using Comprehensive PID (CPID) for optimal usage, as well as hardware scenarios including cluster counting () and ideal TPC performance. Statistical precision gains are evaluated, with corrections for charge misidentification and acceptance applied. Results indicate that precise measurements are feasible and that advanced PID is key to maximising sensitivity to electroweak and new-physics effects.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 7 sections, 6 equations, 7 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Kaon selection region in the $k$-distance plane used in cut 7.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of the angular fits to the reconstructed and corrected data with respect to the parton level distributions. Plots for the $e_L^{-}e_R^{+}$ (left) and $e_R^{-}e_L^{+}$ (right) cases using $dE/dx$.
  • Figure 3: Expected uncertainties for $s$$\overline{s}$ in the ILC250. Right: Comparing different hardware settings ($dE/dx$ vs $dN/dx$ in a pixel TPC vs An ideal TPC)
  • Figure 4: Expected uncertainties for $s$$\overline{s}$ in the LCF@CERN250. Left: Comparing different software approaches ($dE/dx$ vs CPID $dE/dx$). Right: Comparing different hardware settings ($dE/dx$ vs $dN/dx$ in a pixel TPC vs An ideal TPC)
  • Figure 5: Expected impact in the discrimination power for GHU models assuming a 1% (left) or 0.1% (right) uncertainty for $s$$\overline{s}$.
  • ...and 2 more figures