Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unitarity bounds and sum rules in the SMEFT

Luigi C. Bresciani, Paride Paradisi, Andrea Sainaghi

Abstract

We present a comprehensive reassessment of perturbative unitarity bounds in the dimension-six Standard Model Effective Field Theory, exploiting a new formalism based on spinor-helicity techniques to derive partial-wave unitarity bounds for generic $N \to M$ scattering amplitudes. We find that, in several cases, these theoretical constraints are already competitive with, or even stronger than, the corresponding experimental bounds for energy scales above a few TeV. This is especially the case for four-fermion operators under realistic flavor assumptions, where unitarity bounds can be further strengthened by exploiting sum rules.

Unitarity bounds and sum rules in the SMEFT

Abstract

We present a comprehensive reassessment of perturbative unitarity bounds in the dimension-six Standard Model Effective Field Theory, exploiting a new formalism based on spinor-helicity techniques to derive partial-wave unitarity bounds for generic scattering amplitudes. We find that, in several cases, these theoretical constraints are already competitive with, or even stronger than, the corresponding experimental bounds for energy scales above a few TeV. This is especially the case for four-fermion operators under realistic flavor assumptions, where unitarity bounds can be further strengthened by exploiting sum rules.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables)

This paper contains 8 sections, 4 equations, 4 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Parameter space allowed by unitarity bounds in the plane of Wilson coefficients in the single-flavor limit. In the last two plots, we also show the dependence on the relative complex phases $\mathrm{arg}(C_{quqd}^{(1)}/C_{quqd}^{(8)})$ and $\mathrm{arg}(C_{\ell equ}^{(1)}/C_{\ell equ}^{(3)})$.
  • Figure 2: Parameter space allowed by unitarity bounds (blue) and spinning sum rules in the cases of scalar (orange) and vector (green) dominance, in the single-flavor limit. The missing plot for the Wilson coefficients $C_{qd}^{(1,8)}$ is identical to that of $C_{qu}^{(1,8)}$.
  • Figure 3: Minimum energy scales $E_*$ at which the unitarity bounds in Table \ref{['tab:UniBounds']} are violated for each purely bosonic Wilson coefficient in Celada:2024mcf, using the 95% CL marginalized intervals from linear (blue) and quadratic (orange) fits.
  • Figure 4: (Left) Experimental and unitarity constraints on the Wilson coefficients of the operators $O_{\varphi q}^{(1)} = \sum_{p=1,2}i(\varphi^\dagger \overset{\leftrightarrow}{D}{}_\mu \varphi)(\overline q_p \gamma^\mu q_p)$ and $O_{\varphi q}^{(3)} = \sum_{p=1,2}i(\varphi^\dagger \overset{\leftrightarrow}{D}{}_\mu^I \varphi)(\overline q_p \sigma^I \gamma^\mu q_p)$. Experimental limits correspond to $95\%$ CL marginalized intervals Celada:2024mcf. (Middle) Experimental and unitarity constraints on the Wilson coefficients of the operators $O_{Qq}^{1,8} = \sum_{p=1,2}(\overline q_3 \gamma_\mu T^A q_3)(\overline q_p \gamma^\mu T^A q_p)$ and $O_{Qq}^{3,8} = \sum_{p=1,2}(\overline q_3 \gamma_\mu T^A \sigma^I q_3)(\overline q_p \gamma^\mu T^A \sigma^I q_p)$. Experimental limits correspond to $68\%$ CL and are derived from a quadratic fit Brivio:2019ius. Here, the sum rules select the region where $C_{Qq}^{1,8}-(1\pm 2)C_{Qq}^{3,8}$ are positive (negative) for scalar (vector) completions. (Right) Experimental and unitarity constraints on the Wilson coefficients of the operators $[O_{\ell q}^{(1)}]_{3333} = (\overline \ell_3 \gamma^\mu \ell_3)(\overline q_3 \gamma_\mu q_3)$ and $[O_{\ell q}^{(3)}]_{3333} = (\overline \ell_3 \gamma^\mu \sigma^I \ell_3)(\overline q_3 \gamma_\mu \sigma^I q_3)$. Experimental limits correspond to $68\%$ CL Allwicher:2023shc.